Why some organisations prefer in-house to contract security staff
Many organisations’ insurance requirements and crime prevention strategies involve the use of manned security services, a generic term covering a range of activities including patrolling, guarding, access control, protection of cash in transit services etc. These organisations have a choice of employing a contract security company, recruiting in-house security officers or using a combination of the two. According to the Security Industry Training Organisation (SITO), in-house manned security services could account for up to 40 per cent of the sector.1 Despite this there has been very little research into such services yet perceptions of each differ quite markedly. The most comprehensive work is a chapter in South (1988) and there are short references in Draper (1978) and Johnson (1992).
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Association of Chief Police Officers (1988) A review of the private security industry. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
- APEX (1991) Contract security industry 1991 wages and conditions survey. London: APEX Partnership.Google Scholar
- Confederation of European Security Services (1991) Private security: an EC market analysis. Netherlands: Confederation of European Security Services.Google Scholar
- Draper, H. (1978) Private police. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, L. (1992) The rebirth of private policing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jordans (1992) Britain’s security industry. London: Jordans.Google Scholar
- Inspectorate of the Security Industry (1994) The register of manned security companies. Worcester: Inspectorate of the Security Industry.Google Scholar
- Morris, S. (1992) Changing the guard: evidence, dynamics, and implications of the shift from state to non-state police and security provision. University of Leicester: Unpublished Dissertation.Google Scholar
- South, N. (1988) Policing for profit. London: Sage.Google Scholar