Skip to main content
  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of assuming that political behaviour has simple and constant motivation was to build a universal theory of political behaviour — the sort of theory that might work if the pursuit of wealth were as unvarying as (say) the force of gravity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Gordon Tullock, ‘A (Partial) Rehabilitation of the Public Interest Theory’, Public Choice 42, 1, (1984) p. 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dennis C. Mueller, ‘Rational Egoism versus Adaptive Egoism as Fundamental Postulates for a Descriptive Theory of Human Behaviour’, Public Choice 51, 1 (1986), pp. 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Hugh Stretton and Lionel Orchard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stretton, H., Orchard, L. (1994). Public Choice: Living with Failure. In: Public Goods, Public Enterprise, Public Choice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23505-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics