Living Standards in a North Indian Village: An Analysis within the Stochastic Dominance Framework

  • Peter Lanjouw
Part of the Case-Studies in Economic Development book series (CASIED)


This chapter focuses on the measurement of poverty, inequality and welfare within a unified framework of analysis. It examines these issues on the basis of income data from a North Indian village (Palanpur) collected through four separate surveys in 1957/58, 1962/63, 1974/75 and 1983/84.2 The paper seeks to fulfil two objectives: first, an exposition of how the stochastic dominance approach to measurement can be readily implemented within a small village study context; and second, to shed some light on the interlinked paths traced out by poverty, inequality and welfare over time in the village of Palanpur. We begin with a brief description of the village, followed by an outline of the methodology to be adopted.


Cumulative Distribution Function Poverty Line Stochastic Dominance Lorenz Curve Inequality Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ansari, N. (1964), ‘Palanpur: A Study of Its Economic Resources and Economic Activities’ Continuous Village Surveys No. 41, Agricultural Economics Research Centre, University of Delhi.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. (1970), ‘On the Measurement of Inequality’ Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. (1987), ‘On the Measurement of Poverty’ Econometrica, 55(4), 749–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bliss, C. and Stern, N. (1982), Palanpur: the Economy of an Indian Village, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dandekar, V. and Rath, N. (1971), Poverty in India, Poona: Indian School of Political Economy.Google Scholar
  6. Deaton, A. (1989), ‘Rice Prices and Income Distribution in Thailand: a Non-Parametric Analysis’ Economic Journal, 99, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drèze J.P., Lanjouw, P. and Sharma, N. (1990), ‘Credit in a North Indian Village’ mimeo, STICERD, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Foster, J.E. and Shorrocks, A.F. (1988), ‘Poverty Orderings’ Econometrica, 56, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lal, D. (1976), ‘Agricultural Growth, Real Wages and the Rural Poor in India’ Economic and Political Weekly, Review of Agriculture, XI(26), A47–A61.Google Scholar
  10. Lanjouw, P. and Stern, N. (1990), ‘Poverty in Palanpur’ World Bank Economic Review, 5(1), 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lanjouw, P. (1992), Inequality, Poverty and Mobility: the Experience of a North Indian Village, PhD thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  12. Sen, A.K. (1976), ‘Poverty: an Ordinal Approach to Measurement’ Econometrica, 44, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sen, A.K. (1992), Equality and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Shorrocks, A.F. (1983), ‘Ranking Income Distributions’ Economica, 50, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tim Lloyd and Oliver Morrissey 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Lanjouw

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations