Abstract
No serious discussion of religion, East or West, in relation to society and the contemporary world is possible without taking into account a distinction between religion understood as a pervasive dimension in human life and the world historical religions — such as Judaism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism and Hinduism. These religions have defined themselves through their respective objects of worship, their religious communities, their sacred literatures, sacred persons, and their systems of morality. These particular religions represent historical traditions that, under individual cultural, political, geographical and other conditions, came into being as expressions of the human response to the sacred, the transcendent or whatever reality was regarded as Ultimate and worthy of an unconditional devotion. With respect to religion itself as a pervasive fact in human history, we must resist the nominalist tendency to say that ‘religion’ is merely a collective noun or name for these historical religions because that obscures the fact that religion is a distinctive dimension of human life and experience and that, as such, it is not exhausted in the particular religions that have appeared nor is it confined to the lives of those who adhere to these religions. Just as ‘morality’ is not identical with, nor merely a name for, the many ethical systems that have developed throughout the world, but the dimension of evaluation and appraisal of human conduct and the good life, religion likewise is not merely a name but an enduring facet of experience that concerns what is believed to be the reality on which human life and destiny ultimately depend.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Paul Tillich, Christianity and the Encounter of the World Religions (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1963) pp. 4–5.
See R. C. Zaehner, Concordant Discord (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970) pp. 176–7.
Reinhold Niebuhr has dealt with this matter in brilliant fashion in his chapter ‘The Master of Destiny’, in The Irony of American History (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1952) p. 65, where he refers to the ‘cruelties which follow inevitably from the communist pretension that its elite has taken “the leap from the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom” and is therefore no longer subject to the limitations of nature and history which have hitherto bound the actions of men’.
Corliss Lamont, Humanism as a Philosophy (New York: Philosophical Library, 1949) p. 34.
Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy (New York, Simon & Schuster, 1945) p. 364. Though typically whimsical, this view is not without some truth.
Copyright information
© 1994 John E. Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, J.E. (1994). The Religions Proper and Quasi-Religions. In: Quasi-Religions. Themes in Comparative Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23434-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23434-9_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-53982-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23434-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)