Skip to main content
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

The writing on the relationship of Thatcherism to the Conservative tradition and its character as Tory statecraft provides one angle of vision on Thatcherism as a political project, its challenge to the social-democratic state and the new basis for the hegemony it sought to establish. Another came from Marxist writing on British politics, and in particular from those influenced by the Gramscian concept of hegemony. The debate between Gramscian Marxists and their critics became one of the central intellectual debates of the 1980s.

Those half-formed spectres which once hovered on the edge of British politics … have now been fully politicised and installed in the vanguard as a viable basis for hegemony by the Conservatives. As the span of Labour’s fragile base is eroded, this is the historical ‘bloc’ poised to inherit the next phase of the crisis. It is a conjuncture many would prefer to miss.

Hall et al., Policing the Crisis (1978), p. 316

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. Perry Anderson ‘Origins of the present crisis’, New Left Review, 23 (1964) pp. 26–53;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tom Nairn, ‘The Twilight of the British State’, in The Breakup of Britain (London: NLB, 1981), and

    Google Scholar 

  3. ‘The Future of Britain’s Crisis’, New Left Review, 113/4 (1979), pp. 43–70. See also

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perry Anderson, English Questions (London: Verso, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tom Nairn, ‘Enoch Powell: the New Right’, New Left Review, 61 (1970), pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robin Blackburn, ‘The Heath Government: A New Course for British Capitalism’, New Left Review, 70 (1971), pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andrew Glyn and Bob Sutcliffe, British Capitalism, Workers and the Profits Squeeze (London: Penguin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Colin Leys, Politics in Britain (London: Verso, 1989); and

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stuart Hall et al. Policing the Crisis (London: Macmillan, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Purdy, ‘British Capitalism since the war’, Marxism Today, 20:9 (1976), pp. 270–7 and 20:10 (1976), pp. 310–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stuart Hall, ‘Popular democratic versus authoritarian populism’, in A. Hunt (ed.), Marxism and Democracy (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stuart Hall and Bill Schwarz, ‘State and Society 1880–1930’, in M. Langan and B. Schwarz, Crises in the British State 1880–1930 (London: Hutchinson, 1985), pp. 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See S. Beer, Modern British Politics (London: Faber and Faber, 1965) and

    Google Scholar 

  14. Britain Against Itself (New York: Norton, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keith Middlemas Politics in Industrial Society (London: Andre Deutsch, 1979). See also

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bill Schwarz’s assessment of Middlemas’ work ‘Conservatives and Corporatism’, New Left Review, 166 (1987), pp. 107–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nicos Poulantzas, State, Power, Socialism (London: NLB, 1978); and

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bob Jessop, Nicos Poulantzas (London: Macmillan, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dominic Strinati, ‘State intervention, the Economy, and the Crisis’, in A. Stewart (ed.), Contemporary Britain (London: RKP, 1983); and

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stuart Hall et al., Policing the Crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stuart Hall et al., Policing the Crisis; The Great Moving Right Show’, Marxism Today (1979), pp. 107–28) — revised version printed in S. Hall and M. Jacques (eds), The Politics of Thatcherism (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  22. ‘Popular democratic versus authoritarian populism’, in Hunt, Marxism and Democracy Most of Hall’s key writings on Thatcherism are collected in A Hard Road to Renewal (London: Verso, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Jacques and F. Mulhern (eds), The Forward March of Labour Halted? (London: Verso, 1981). Eric Hobsbawm’s article was first published in Marxism Today (September 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See especially Eric Hobsbawm, ‘Labour’s Lost Millions’, Marxism Today (October 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eric Hobsbawm’s essays on labour are collected in Politics for a Rational Left (London: Verso, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Gavin Kitching, Rethinking Socialism (London: Methuen, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London: Verso, 1985). Strong criticism of these positions has come from Ellen Meiksins Wood, The Retreat from Class (London: Verso, 1986) and Ralph Miliband, ‘The New Revisionism in Britain’, New Left Review, 150 (1985), pp. 5–26. See also Ben Fine et al., Class Politics: An Answer to its Critics (London: Central Books, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Patrick Seyd, The Rise and Fall of the Labour Left (London: Macmillan, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tony Benn, ‘Who Dares Wins’, Marxism Today, 29:1 (January 1985), pp. 12–14. See also the reply by Stuart Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Patrick Hutber, The Decline and fall of the Middle Class and how it can fight back (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roger King and N. Nugent, Respectable Rebels (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bob Jessop, Kevin Bonnett, Simon Bromley and Tom Ling, ‘Authoritarian Populism, Two Nations, and Thatcherism’, New Left Review, 147 (1984), pp. 32–60.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andrew Glyn and John Harrison, The British Economic Disaster (London: Pluto, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  34. See E. A. Brett, The World Economy since the War (London: Macmillan, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  35. See John Ross, Thatcher and Friends (London: Pluto, 1983; also

    Google Scholar 

  36. ‘Does Thatcherism have a Future’, International, 7:2 (March 1982), pp. 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See H. Beynon (ed.), Digging Deeper (London: Verso, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  38. See Geoffrey Ingham, Capitalism Divided? (London: Macmillan, 1984); and

    Google Scholar 

  39. F. Longstreth, ‘The City, Industry, and the State’, in C. Crouch (ed.), State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ross’ inclusion of construction as a sector that benefited from the policies of the Thatcher government has been questioned by Overbeek in his book, Global Capitalism and National Decline (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Colin Leys, ‘Thatcherism and British Manufacturing: A Question of hegemony’, New Left Review, 151 (1985), pp. 5–25; Henk Overbeek, Global Capitalism and National Decline, Bob Jessop, The mid-life crisis of Thatcherism and the birth-pangs of post-Fordism’, New Socialist, 36 (March 86).

    Google Scholar 

  42. See the analysis in Charles Leadbeater and John Lloyd, In Search of Work (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ben Fine and Laurence Harris, The Peculiarities of the British Economy (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  44. See Tessa ten Tusscher, ‘Patriarchy, Capitalism and the New Right,’ in J. Evans et al. (eds), Feminism and Political Theory (London: Sage, 1986) and

    Google Scholar 

  45. John Solomos, Race and Racism in Contemporary Britain (London: Macmillan, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  46. See Miriam David, ‘Moral and Maternal: the Family in the Right’, Gill Seidel, ‘Culture, Nation, and ‘Race’ in the British and French New Right’, and David Edgar, ‘The Free or the Good’, in Ruth Levitas (ed.), The Ideology of the New Right (Cambridge: Polity, 1986). See also Lynne Segal, ‘The Heat in the Kitchen’, in Hall and Jacques (eds), The Politics of Thatcherism.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bea Campbell, Iron Ladies (London: Virago, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Peter Riddell, The Thatcher Government (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Richard Rose, Do Parties Make a Difference? (London: Macmillan, 1984). See also Dennis Kavanagh, Thatcherism and British Politics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Christopher Hollis, ‘The Merits and Defects of Marx’, in G. Woodcock (ed.), A Hundred Years of Revolution (London: Porcupine Press, 1948), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  51. See Grahame Thompson, The Conservatives’ Economic Policy (London: Croom Helm, 1986);

    Google Scholar 

  52. Maurice Mullard, The Politics of Public Expenditure (London: Croom Helm, 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  53. Paul Mosley, The Making of Economic Policy (London: Wheatsheaf, 1984); and

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jim Tomlinson Monetarism: Is there an Alternative? (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bob Jessop et al. ‘Authoritarian Populism, Two Nations, and Thatcherism’, New Left Review, 147; ‘Thatcherism and the Politics of hegemony: a reply to Stuart Hall’, New Left Review, 153 (1985), pp. 87–101;

    Google Scholar 

  56. ‘Popular Capitalism, Flexible Accumulation, and Left Strategy’, New Left Review, 165 (1987), pp. 104–22. See also

    Google Scholar 

  57. Fiona Atkins, ‘Thatcherism, populist authoritarianism, and the search for a new left political strategy’, Capital and Class, 28 (1986), pp. 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bob Jessop ‘The Transformation of the State in Post-War Britain’, in R. Scase The State in Western Europe (London: Croom Helm, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  59. See Bob Jessop, The Capitalist State (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982), pp. 244–5.

    Google Scholar 

  60. See Bill Jordan, The State (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Stuart Hall, ‘Authoritarian Populism: a reply to Jessop et al.’, New Left Review, 151 (1985), pp. 115–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Andrew Gamble

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gamble, A. (1994). The struggle for hegemony. In: The Free Economy and the Strong State. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23387-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics