Advertisement

Recent Developments in Community Policing

Chapter

Abstract

In the last year or two there has been a quiet revolution in British policing. This has been a result, in part, of a policy of chief police officers to realign operational policing to contemporary needs. This has involved a deliberate attempt to shift the policing paradigm from a narrow conception of police enforcement to a broader conception of police service. The main vehicle for this change has been the influential Strategic Policy Document published by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and the development within this document of the idea of ‘quality of service’ (ACPO, 1990).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Association of Chief Police Officers (1990) Strategic Policy Document. Setting the Standards for Policing: Meeting Community Expectations (London: ACPO).Google Scholar
  2. Alderson, J. (1978) Communal Policing (Exeter: Devon and Cornwall Constabulary).Google Scholar
  3. Bayley, D. H. (1988) ‘Community Policing: A Report From The Devil’s Advocate’ in J. R. Greene and S. D. Mastrofski (eds) Community Policina: Rhetoric or Reality (New York: Praeger) pp. 225–37.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, T. H. (1989) Contact Patrols in Birmingham and London: An Evaluation of a Fear Reducing Strategy, Report to the Home Office (Cambridge: Institute of Criminology).Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, T. H. (1990) Evaluating Neighbourhood Watch (Aldershot: Gower).Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, T. H. (1991) ‘The Effectiveness of a Police-Initiated Fear Reducing Strategy’, British Journal of Criminology, 31, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, T. H. and Lupton, R. (1990) National Review of Community Oriented Patrols: Report, Report to the Home Office Research and Planning Unit (Cambridge: Institute of Criminology).Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, T. H. and Lupton, R. (1992a) ‘A Survey of the Allocation and Use of Community Constables in England and Wales’, British Journal of Criminology, 32, 2, 167–82.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, T. H. and Lupton, R. (1992b) ‘A National Activity Survey of Police Work’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 3, 200–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, D. and Iles, S. (1985) Community Constables: A Study of a Policing Initiative, Home Office Research and Planning Unit Paper No. 30 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  11. Butler, A. J. P. and Tharme, K. (1983) Chelmsley Wood Policing Experiment: Evaluation Report (Birmingham: West Midlands Police).Google Scholar
  12. Chatterton, M. (1989) ‘Managing Paperwork’ in M. Weatheritt (ed.) Police Research: Some Future Prospects (Aldershot: Avebury) pp. 107–36.Google Scholar
  13. Chatterton, M. (1991) ‘Organisational Constraints in the Use of Information and Information Technology in Problem-focused Area Policing’, Paper presented at the British Criminology Conference held in York, June.Google Scholar
  14. Eck, J. E. and Spelman, W. (1987) Problem Solving: Problem-Oriented Policing in Newport News (Washington, D.C.: Police Executive Research Forum).Google Scholar
  15. Ekblom, P. (1986) ‘Community Policing: Obstacles and Issues’ in P. Willmott (ed.) The Debate about Community (London: Policy Studies Institute) pp. 16–30.Google Scholar
  16. Gay, W. G., Day, T. H. and Woodward, J. P. (1977) Neighborhood Team Policing: Phase One Report (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, H. (1990) Problem-Oriented Policing (London: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  18. Holdaway, S. (1983) Inside the British Police: A Force at Work (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  19. Holdaway, S. (1989) ‘Discovering Structure. Studies Of The British Police Occupational Culture’ in M. Weatheritt (ed.) Police Research: Some Future Prospects (Aldershot: Avebury) pp. 55–75.Google Scholar
  20. Home Office (1981) The Brixton Disorders, 10–12 April 1981: Report of an Enquiry by the Rt. Hon. The Lord Scarman, OBE, Cmnd 8427 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  21. Home Office (1990) Partnership in Crime Prevention (London: Home Office).Google Scholar
  22. Home Office (1991) Safer Communities: The Local Delivery of Crime Prevention Through the Partnership Approach (Morgan Report) (London: Standing Conference on Crime Prevention).Google Scholar
  23. Irving, B., Bird, C., Hibberd, M. and Willmore, J. (1989) Neighbourhood Policing: The Natural History of a Policing Experiment (London: The Police Foundation).Google Scholar
  24. Joint Consultative Committee (1990) Operational Policing Review (Surbiton: Police Federation).Google Scholar
  25. Kelling, G. L., Pate, T., Dieckman, D. and Brown, C. E. (1974) The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: A Technical Report (Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation).Google Scholar
  26. Kemp, C. and Morgan, R. (1990) Lay Visitors to Police Stations, Report to the Home Office (Bristol: Bristol Centre for Criminal Justice).Google Scholar
  27. Knutsson, J. (1991) ‘Community-oriented Policing: The Swedish Experiences’, Paper presented at a conference in Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  28. Liddle, A. M. and Bottoms, A. (1991) Implementing Circular 8/84: A Retrospective Assessment Of The Five Towns Crime Prevention Initiative, Report to the Home Office (Cambridge: Institute of Criminology).Google Scholar
  29. Moore, C. and Brown, J. (1981) Community Versus Crime (Dorchester: Bedford Square Press).Google Scholar
  30. Morgan, R. (1986) ‘Policing by Consent: Legitimating the Doctrine’, in D. J. Smith and R. Morgan (eds) Coming to Terms with Policing (London: Routledge) pp. 217–34.Google Scholar
  31. Pate, A. M. (1986) ‘Experimenting with Foot Patrol: The Newark Experience’ in D. P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? (London: Sage) pp. 137–56.Google Scholar
  32. Pate, A. M., Wycoff, M. A., Skogan, W. G. and Sherman, L. W. (1986) Reducing Fear of Crime in Houston and Newark (Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation).Google Scholar
  33. Phillips, S. V. and Cochrane, R. (1988) The Role and Function of Police Community Liaison Officers, Home Office Research and Planning Unit Paper No.51 (London: Home Office).Google Scholar
  34. Rosenbaum, D. P. (1986) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  35. Rosenbaum, D. P. (1988) ‘Community Crime Prevention: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature’, Justice Quarterly, 5, 323–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sampson, A., Stubbs, P., Smith, D., Pearson, G. and Blagg, H. (1988)’ Crime, Localities and the Multi-Agency Approach’, British Journal of Criminology, 28, 478–93.Google Scholar
  37. Schwartz, A. L. and Clarren, S. N. (1977) The Cincinnati Team Policing Experiment: A Summary Report (Washington D.C.: Police Foundation).Google Scholar
  38. Short, C. (1983) ‘Community Policing: Beyond Slogans’ in T. H. Bennett (ed.) The Future of Policing (Cambridge: Institute of Criminology) pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
  39. Skolnick, J. H. and Bayley, D. H. (1987) ‘Theme and Variation in Community Policing’ in N. Morris and M. Tonry (eds) Crime and Justice (Washington D.C.: National Institute of Justice) pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, D. J. (1983) Police and People in London: A Survey of Police Officers (London: Policy Studies Institute).Google Scholar
  41. Trojanowicz, R. (1986) ‘Evaluating a Neighborhood Foot Patrol Program: The Flint, Michigan Project’ in D. P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? (London: Sage) pp. 157–78.Google Scholar
  42. Trojanowicz, R. and Bucqueroux, B. (1990) Community Policing: A Contemporary Perspective (Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
  43. Waddington, P. A. J. (1984) ‘Community Policing: A Sceptical Appraisal’ in P. Norton (ed.) Law and Order and British Politics (Aldershot: Gower) pp. 84–99.Google Scholar
  44. Weatheritt, M. (1983) ‘Community Policing: Does It Work and How Do We Know?’ in T. H. Bennett (ed.) The Future of Policing, Cropwood Conference Series No.15 (Cambridge: Institute of Criminology) pp. 127–42.Google Scholar
  45. Weatheritt, M. (1986) Innovations in Policing (London: Croom Helm/Police Foundation).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Trevor Bennett 1994

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations