Advertisement

Newman’s Apologia

The Self in a Faceless World
  • Patrick Grant

Abstract

Newman tells us that throughout the ages of the church there has been a steady disinclination among teachers ‘to confine themselves to the mere literal interpretation of Scripture’. Rather, the church’s ‘most subtle and powerful method of proof … is the mystical sense’, and Newman concludes that ‘It may be almost laid down as an historical fact, that the mystical interpretation and orthodoxy will stand or fall together.’1

Keywords

Moral Factory Literary Imagination Spiritual Reality Hide Centre Material Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Hilda Graef, God and Myself. The Spirituality of John Henry Newman (London: Peter Davies, 1967), p. 171. See also p. 109: ‘Newman never became familiar with the Catholic mystics.’Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Edward Sillem, ed., The Philosophical Notebook of John Henry Newman, 2 vols (Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1969), vol. 1, General Introduction to the Study of Newman’s Philosophy. Page numbers are cited in the text.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    See Sheridan Gilley, Newman and his Age (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1990), p. 356Google Scholar
  4. Ian Ker, John Henry Newman. A Biography (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), p. 619.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Patrick Grant 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Grant
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations