Abstract
The main elements of a distinctively modern sense of the person came into focus during the Renaissance and Reformation, which is also the period of the scientific revolution. The rediscovery, especially in fifteenth-century Italy, of the ancient literatures of Greece and Rome mingled initially in complex ways with reform movements within the Church. Eventually, when Luther broke with the papacy, there developed throughout Europe a spectrum of independent Christian denominations. In general, the Reformation might seem at first to have little to do with the new science, but both movements criticised the futility and obscurantism of metaphysics in a similar way.1 For Martin Luther as for Francis Bacon, scholastic philosophy was a principal enemy because it depended so heavily on a metaphysical language that seemed empty and impractical. As we have seen in Chapter 4, by the end of the Middle Ages the coherence and authority of a metaphysically-buttressed, feudal Church was much eroded, not least by the rise of a sceptical, philosophical critique questioning the reliability of human language for describing the causes, essences, and ontological dimensions of the natural and spiritual worlds. Thus, when Luther learned by experience that the official ecclesiastical instruments for dispensing divine grace did not necessarily bring about peace of mind or a tranquil conscience, his subsequent teaching fell upon many ears already well disposed to receive it.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For an account of the cultural cross-currents, see Heiko Augustinus Obermann, The Dawn of the Reformation. Essays in Late Medieval and Early Reformation Thought (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1986); Forerunners of the Reformation. The Shape of Late Medieval Thought, translations by Paul L. Nyhus (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966).
For a general account of Erasmus’ career, see Roland H. Bainton, Erasmus of Christendom (New York: Scribner, 1969)
Johan Huizinga, Erasmus and the Age of Reformation, trans. F. Hopman and Barbara Fowler (New York: Harper, 1957; first published, 1924)
Margaret Mann Phillips, Erasmus and the Northern Renaissance (Suffolk: Boydell & Brewer, 1981; first published, 1949).
I draw here on Rowan Williams, The Wound of Knowledge. Christian Spirituality from the New Testament to St. John of the Cross (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1979), pp. 143–5.
See Robert H. Murray, Erasmus and Luther: Their Attitude to Toleration (New York: Burt Franklin, 1920), for an account of Erasmus’ thought in relation to Luther’s, centring on the free-will controversy.
For an account of this levelling, see Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 185 ff.
It is unclear what Erasmus was doing from 1509 to 1511, the time when Praise of Folly was written. See M.A. Screech, Erasmus, Ecstasy and The Praise of Folly (Harmondworth: Penguin, 1980; Peregrine, 1988), p. xv.
See, for instance, W. David Kay, ‘Erasmus’ Learned Joking: The Ironic Use of Classical Wisdom in The Praise of Folly’, Texas Studies in Language and Literature 19 (1977), 247–67, on Erasmus’ parody of humanist learning, and on the core of objective truth.
For Erasmus’ sense of living tradition, see R.J. Schoeck, ‘The Place of Erasmus Today’, ed. Richard L. De Molen, Erasmus of Rotterdam: A Quincentennial Symposium (New York: Twayne, 1971), pp. 80 ff.
Enchiridion, p. 53. Erasmus was later critical of excessive allegory. See Jerry H. Bentley, Humanists and Holy Writ (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1983), p. 188.
John B. Payne, Erasmus. His Theology of the Sacraments (Richmond, Va.: John Knox Press, 1970), p. 56, cites the following example from 1 John.
See, Erasmus, His Theology of the Sacraments, pp. 56 ff.; Bruce Mansfield, Phoenix of His Age. Interpretations of Erasmus c. 1550–1750 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979), p. 54, repeats some of Payne’s points, and shows how followers of Servetus thought of Erasmus as a precursor.
See Charles Béné, Érasme et saint Augustin, ou Influence de Saint Augustin sur l’humanisme d’Érasme (Geneva: Librarie Droz, 1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1994 Patrick Grant
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grant, P. (1994). Erasmus. In: Spiritual Discourse and the Meaning of Persons. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23297-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23297-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23299-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23297-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)