Abstract
Let me sketch my conception of narrative perspective first (cf. Meindl, pp. 14–30). It hinges upon the distinction between what I call the authorial and figural frame of reference in narrative discourse. This distinction governs a system of narrative privileges and limitations. The figural frame of reference features a first-person narrator or, in third-person narrative, a centre-of-consciousness figure. These narrator or reflector figures have no direct access to the minds of other characters, whose thoughts cannot be simply stated. Thus, narrative perspective is limited in quantitative terms. On the other hand, the attitude and views of a narrator or reflector figure are only conditionally valid. They can occupy the whole range of human modes: reliability, error, deception of self or others, and so on. In qualitative terms, narrative perspective is thus unlimited. Conversely, in the authorial frame of reference of third person narrative, the minds of the fictional characters are open to inspection. A character’s thought can be simply stated. Quantitatively speaking, narrative perspective is thus unlimited. On the other hand, authorial attitude is not equivalent to a narrating figure or subject with potentially subjective views.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Atwood, Margaret, Dancing Girls and Other Stories, Bantam Seal Book (Toronto: McClelland & Steward-Bantam, 1978).
Atwood, Margaret, Bluebeard’s Egg, Bantam Seal Book (Toronto: McClelland Steward-Bantam, 1984).
Brown, Russell M., ‘Atwood’s Sacred Wells’, Essays on Canadian Writing, no. 17 (1980) pp. 5–p43.
Davey, Frank, ‘Alternate Stories: the Short Fiction of Audrey Thomas and Margaret Atwood’, Canadian Literature, no. 109 (1986) pp. 5–16.
Godard, Barbara, ‘Palimpsest: Margaret Atwood’s Bluebeard’s Egg’, RANAM, no. 20 (1987) pp. 51–60.
Hutcheon, Linda, The Canadian Postmodern: A Study of Contemporary English-Canadian Fiction (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1988).
Jehlen, Myra, ‘Archimedes and the Paradox of Feminist Criticism’, in Elizabeth and Emily K. Abel (eds), The’ signs’ Reader: Women, Gender and Scholarship (Chicago, III: University of Chicago Press, 1983) pp. 69–75.
Meindl, Dieter, Der amerikanische Roman zwischen Naturalismus und Postmoderne (1930–1960): Eine Entwicklungsstudie auf diskurstheoretischer Grundlage (Munich: Fink, 1983).
Miller, Nancy K. ‘Preface’, in Nancy K. Miller (ed), The Poetics of Gender (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986) pp. xi–xv.
Wilson, Sharon R., ‘Bluebeard’s Forbidden Room: Gender Images in Margaret Atwood’s Visual and Literary Art’, American Review of Canadian Literature, vol. 26 (1986) pp. 385–97.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1994 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meindl, D. (1994). Gender and Narrative Perspective in Margaret Atwood’s Stories. In: Nicholson, C. (eds) Margaret Atwood: Writing and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23282-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23282-6_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-61181-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23282-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)