Advertisement

Concepts

  • Jerker Carlsson
  • Gunnar Köhlin
  • Anders Ekbom
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

To analyse the case studies and test our hypotheses we require a good descriptive language; or, in other words, it becomes necessary to define the key concepts which we will use for analysing the reality as it is portrayed in the case studies. The concepts which are of relevance to us are: organization, evaluation and economic analysis. In the following sections each of these concepts will be given an operational meaning, which makes them useful as analytical tools.

Keywords

Political Economy Consumer Surplus Shadow Price Recipient Country Shadow Prex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    OECD, Methods and Procedures in Aid Evaluation. Paris, 1986, p. 65.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riddell, Foreign Aid Reconsidered The Johns Hopkins University Press/ ODI, 1987, p. 192.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    P. H. Rossi, H. E. Freeman and S. R. Wright, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. London: Sage, 1979, p. 33.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    M. Scriven, ‘Goal Free Evaluation’, in D. Hamilton et al. Beyond the Numbers Game. London: Macmillan, 1977; OECD, Methods and Procedures. pp. 45–6.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    J. Dupuit, ‘On the Measurement of the Utility of Public Works’ (1844), translated in International Economic Papers, No. 2. London: Macmillan, 1952.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    A.C. Harberger, ‘Three Basic Postulates for Applied Economics: An Interpretive Essay’, Journal of Economic Literature, IX, 3, 1971, pp. 785–97.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    A. Abouchar, Project Decision Making in the Public Sector. Toronto: Lexington Books, 1985, p. 75.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Based on I. M. D. Little and M. F. G. Scott, Using Shadow Prices. London: Heinemann, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    A. Ray, Cost Benefit Analysis — Issues and Methodologies, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. 24.
    H. Chenery and M. Syrquin, Patterns of Development 1959–1970. Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. 28.
    G. H. Fisher, ‘The role of cost-utility analysis in programme budgeting’, in D. Novick (ed.), Programme Budgeting. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1964, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
  12. 29.
    G. A. Armstrong and G. A. Bridger, ‘Cost-effectiveness: appraising projects with non-quantifiable economic benefits’, Project Appraisal, March, 1987, p. 63.Google Scholar
  13. 30.
    H. M. Levin, Cost-Effectiveness. A Primer. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983, pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  14. 32.
    A. Gouldner, ‘Organizational Analysis’, in R. Merton, L. Broom and L. S. Cottrell, Sociology Today. New York: Basic Books, 1959; N. Brunsson, The Organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. New York: John Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  15. 33.
    G. Morgan, Images of Organization. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1986, pp. 150–5.Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    H. Simon, Administrative Behaviour. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  17. 38.
    H. Mintzberg, Mintzberg on Management. Inside our Strange World of Organizations. New York: The Free Press, 1989, ch. 8.Google Scholar
  18. 39.
    H. Mintzberg, Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Editions, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. 42.
    C. Perrow, ‘A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations’, American Sociological Review, April, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. 43.
    D. Katz and R. L. Kahn, The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  21. 46.
    C. Argyris, Individen och Organizationen. Stockholm: Aldus, 1971, p. 99.Google Scholar
  22. 49.
    J. F. Bakka and E. Fivelsdal, Organizationsteori. Struktur, kultur, processer (Organization theory: structure, culture, processes). Stockholm: Liber, 1988, p. 26.Google Scholar
  23. 51.
    B. Czarniawska, Controlling Top Management in Large Organizations. Poland and USA. Aldershot: Gower, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jerker Carlsson, Gunnar Köhlin and Anders Ekbom 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerker Carlsson
    • 1
  • Gunnar Köhlin
    • 1
  • Anders Ekbom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations