Abstract
In the previous chapter I discussed the split-brain cases and the possibility of scattered agents and group minds. Given these imaginary entities, the task of determining where one mind begins and another leaves off, either within one brain or across several brains, calls for some tricky disentangling. We need a principled way of telling whether we have one mind or two, what the boundaries between minds should be, and what it is for several mental contents to belong to a single mind. The search for a criterion for the unity of the mind seems a valid philosophical task. However, this enterprise may be misguided and the problem of the unity of the mind spurious. Perhaps we only think that there is a problem because we are confused and in error. This is the influential view that P.F. Strawson expressed in his well-known essay on persons.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1994 Scots Philosophical Club
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brooks, D.H.M. (1994). Is the Problem of the Unity of the Mind a Pseudo-Problem?. In: The Unity of the Mind. Studies in Contemporary Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23178-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23178-2_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23180-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23178-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)