Skip to main content

Regulative Ideals: Kant

  • Chapter
The Role of the Unrealisable

Abstract

Kant contrasted principles used regulatively in reflection on experience with those which were constitutive of its objectivity. The latter were the Categories of the Understanding, such as Substance and Cause; they were a priori, as not derived from experience, but necessary to bring objective order into sensory representations. There are also Ideas of Reason which transcend possible experience. They may be Ideas such as God or the Soul whose existence is asserted by pure Reason alone. Kant argues that these grounds are not valid, but the Ideas of Reason can be treated pragmatically as if they existed, or entertained in faith as necessary postulates of morality. I am not concerned with the ontology of Ideas of Reason, though in the end there may be metaphysical questions which I cannot escape. My present interest is in how Kant sees the regulative use of certain concepts, used reflectively by the practical reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Dorothy Emmet

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Emmet, D. (1994). Regulative Ideals: Kant. In: The Role of the Unrealisable. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23158-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics