Abstract
The Elizabethan World Picture is frequently pronounced dead, yet it has remarkable powers of resurrection. Fifty years ago, E. M. W. Tillyard demonstrated how often defenders of the Elizabethan regime appealed to the analogy of the order of nature: monarchy and hierarchy were universal features of the cosmos, and any attempt to overthrow them was a perversion of a divine order.1 Somewhat more recently, the belief that the early modern period was particularly susceptible to arguments from natural analogy was strongly reaffirmed by Michel Foucault in his highly influential book The Order of Things.2 And some revisionist historians, concerned to demonstrate that the radical political ideas of the mid-seventeenth century were fundamentally alien to English culture, have recently been reiterating some of Tillyard’s arguments.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Lisa Jardine and Anthony Grafton, ‘“Studied for Action”: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’, Past and Present, vol. CXXIX (November 1990), pp. 30–78 (43).
Patrick Collinson, ‘The Monarchical Republic of Queen Elizabeth I’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, vol. LXIX (1986), pp. 394–424.
R. J. Manning, ‘Rule and Order Strange: A Reading of Sir John Davies’ Orchestra’, English Literary Renaissance, vol. XV (1985), pp. 175–94.
Ian Sowton, ‘Hidden Persuaders as a Means of Literary Grace: Sixteenth-Century Poetics and Rhetoric in England’, University of Toronto Quarterly, vol. XXXII (1962–3), pp. 55–69 (65–68);
John Huntington, ‘Philosophical Seduction in Chapman, Davies, and Donne’, ELH, vol. XLIV (1977), 40–59.
Philip J. Finkelpearl, John Marston of the Middle Temple (Cambridge, Mass., 1969), pp. 48ff. Jeanie R. Brink, ‘Sir John Davies’s Orchestra: Political Symbolism and Textual Revisions’, Durham University Journal, vol. LXXII (1980), pp. 195–202, gives a different political reading from Manning, arguing that the text is pro-Essex and critical of Elizabeth.
Brian Vickers, The Artistry of Shakespeare’s Prose (London, 1968), p. 253, argues that the degree speech ‘in its dramatic context and in its portentously diffuse style’ should be taken ‘as a specious politic manipulation of those ideas’. Frank Kermode, ‘“Opinion” in Troilus and Cressida’, in Susanne Kappeier and Norman Bryson (eds.), Teaching the Text (London, 1983), pp. 164–79; T.M. Burvill, ‘Ulysses on “Degree”: Shakespeare’s Doctrine of Political Order?’, Parergon, N.S., vol. II (1984), pp. 191–203. But see Charles and Michelle Martindale, Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity: An Introductory Essay (London and New York, 1990), pp. 91–120.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1994 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norbrook, D. (1994). Rhetoric, Ideology and the Elizabethan World Picture. In: Mack, P. (eds) Renaissance Rhetoric. Warwick Studies in the European Humanities series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23144-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23144-7_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23146-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23144-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)