Abstract
Although there are few countries which leave incentives in their farm sectors undistorted, there are many in which the economy-wide pattern of protection does not favour agriculture as a whole. Convention in the theory of trade protection (Anderson and Hayami, 1986; Vousden, 1990) would lead us to expect that most agricultural exporting countries would be members of this latter group. The principal modern exceptions, of course, are the EC and the United States, both of which now protect exporting agricultural sectors. These exceptions aside, the predominant agricultural exporting countries are indeed among those whose patterns of protection do not assist agriculture.
Thanks are due to Don Gunasekera, Richard Higgott and T.K. Warley for useful discussions on the subject of the paper, and to Prue Phillips for access to the resources of the ANU International Economic Databank. The introductory parts of the chapter draw on Tyers (1992b), though the analysis presented here is more extensive and the results differ as a consequence of the use of a recently up-dated and extended version of the Tyers-Anderson model, combined with more recent estimates of incentive distortions in agriculture. Constructive suggestions from the editors are appreciated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1994 K. A. Ingersent, A. J. Rayner and R. C. Hine
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tyers, R. (1994). The Cairns Group Perspective. In: Ingersent, K.A., Rayner, A.J., Hine, R.C. (eds) Agriculture in the Uruguay Round. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23123-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23123-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23125-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23123-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)