Skip to main content

Realism, Non-Realism and Atheism: Why Believe in an Objectively Real God?

  • Chapter
World Views and Perceiving God
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

The transcendent God has for many become an unavailable God. As Jean-Paul Sartre proclaims in his play The Devil and the Good Lord:

I supplicated, I demanded a sign, I sent messages to Heaven, no reply. Heaven ignored my very name. Each minute I wondered what I could be in the eyes of God. Now I know the answer: nothing. God does not see me, God does not hear me, God does not know me … I am going to tell you a colossal joke: God doesn’t exist.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John A. T. Robinson, Honest to God (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1963), p. 43. (Italics mine.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a classic presentation of verificationism against theism see A. J. Ayer, Language, Truth, and Logic (New York: Dover, 1952), Introduction, pp. 5–16, and pp. 115–17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A clear and concise response is offered by George I. Mavrodes in ‘God and Verification’, Canadian Journal of Theology, Vol. 10 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  4. reprinted in Malcolm L. Diamond and Thomas V. Litzenburg, Jr. (eds), The Logic of God: Theology and Verification (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1975), p. 223

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also Alvin Plantinga, God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967), pp. 156–68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Hick, ‘Theology and Verification’, Theology Today, Vol. 17 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  7. reprinted in Basil Mitchell (ed.), The Philosophy of Religion (Oxford University Press, Oxford Readings in Philosophy, 1971), pp. 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  8. David Hume, in Nelson Pike (ed.), Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970), Part V (pp. 48 and 51).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (London: Macmillan, repr. 1973), pp. 500–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Immanuel Kant, in Allen W. Wood and Gertrude M. Clark (eds), Lectures on Philosophical Theology (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press: 1978), p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith (New York: Harper & Row, 1958), p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Søren Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments, trans. David F. Swenson, 2nd edn, trans. rev. by Howard V. Hong (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962), pp. 25 and 26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon Kaufman, The Theological Imagination (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1981), p. 268 and p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon D. Kaufman, Theology for a Nuclear Age (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1985; Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985), pp. 37 and 42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Z. Phillips, The Concept of Prayer (New York: Shocken Books, 1966), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also Faith and Philosophical Enquiry (New York: Shocken Books, 1971), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Z. Phillips, Religion Without Explanation (Oxford: Blackwell, 1976), pp. 148–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Z. Phillips, ‘Religion and Epistemology: Some Contemporary Confusions’, in Faith and Philosophical Enquiry, op. cit., p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Z. Phillips, review of Reason, Relativism and God in The Times Literary Supplement, 14 November 1986, p. 1289.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Don Cupitt, Taking Leave of God (New York: Crossroad, 1981), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bertrand Russell and F. C. Copleston, ‘A Debate on the Existence of God’, repr. in John Hick (ed.), The Existence of God (New York: Macmillan, 1964), pp. 173 and 175.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, trans. George Eliot (New York: Harper & Row, Harper Torchbooks, 1957), pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sigmund Freud, The Failure of an Illusion (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, rev. 1964), p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Antony Flew, The Presumption of Atheism and Other Philosophical Essays on God, Freedom, and Immortality (London: Elek, 1976), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See William James, ‘Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth’, in Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Kant, Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. Theodore M. Green and Hoyt H. Hudson (New York: Harper & Row, Harper Torchbooks, 1960), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karl Barth, The Epistle to the Romans (Oxford University Press, 6th edn, repr. 1972), p. 435.

    Google Scholar 

  28. John Hick, The Problems of Religious Pluralism (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See also Hick, God Has Many Names (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith (New York: Harper & Row, 1957), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Joseph Runzo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Runzo, J. (1993). Realism, Non-Realism and Atheism: Why Believe in an Objectively Real God?. In: World Views and Perceiving God. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23106-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics