Advertisement

Port Functions, Innovation and the Making of the Megalopolis

  • Josef W. Konvitz

Abstract

The megalopolis, as Jean Gottmann so clearly explained, is not a single very large city, but a region composed of many cities of different sizes that are functionally interrelated. The spatial structure of the megalopolis therefore generates a demand for transport and communications. Ports and shipping filled that demand in ways that explain the maritime characteristics of megalopoli until the mid-twentieth century. What did ports contribute to the development of megalopolises? How has the impact of the port on megalopolis changed over time? And how can the spatial characteristics of big-city ports be related to an analysis of urban functions? In a paper of this length, broad generalisations will be considered as hypotheses to be tested.

Keywords

Central Business District Port City Port Activity Port Function Shipping Centre 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jan de Vries, European Urbanization, 1500–1800 (Cambridge, Mass., 1984) p. 166.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richard L. Meier, ‘Technological Innovation in Urban Environment’, in Oscar Handlin and John Burchard (eds), The Historian and the City (Cambridge, Mass., 1966) pp. 74–83.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jane Jacobs, Cities and the Wealth of Nations (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jean Gottmann, Megalopolis (New York, 1961) p. 149.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allen R. Pred, The Spatial Dynamics of US Urban-Industrial Growth, 1800–1914: Interpretive and Theoretical Essays (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geographical momentum is: ‘The tendency of places with established installations and services to maintain or increase their importance after the conditions originally determining their establishment have appreciably altered’ (Geographical Glossary Committee, Geographical Journal, 118 (1952) p. 346).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. G. Sturmey, British Shipping and World Competition (London, 1962); Gordon Jackson, The Shipping Industry’, in Michael J. Freeman and Derek H. Aldcroft (eds), Transport in Victorian Britain (Manchester, 1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emmanuel Tobier, ‘Manhattan’s Business District in the Industrial Age’, in John Hall Mollenkopf (ed.). Power, Culture and Place: Essays on New York City (New York, 1988) pp. 77–105.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roy S. McElwee, Ports and Terminal Facilities (New York, 1918) p. 259.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norman S. B. Gras, An Introduction to Economic History (New York and London, 1922) p. 199. See also Josef W. Konvitz, ‘William J. Wilgus and Engineering Projects to Improve the Port of New York, 1900–1930’ Technology and Culture, 30 (1989) pp. 398–425.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carl Abbott, ‘International Cities in the Dual Systems Model: The Transformations of Los Angeles and Washington’, Urban History Yearbook, 18 (1991) pp. 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. S. Hoyle and D. A. Pinder, Cityport Industrialization and Regional Development: Spatial Analyses and Planning Strategies (Oxford, 1981) p. 327.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    André Vigarié, Ports de commerce et vie littorale (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhoads Murphey, ‘On the Evolution of the Port City’, in Frank Broeze (ed.). Brides of the Sea: Port Cities of Asia from the 16th–20th Centuries (Honolulu, 1989) p. 227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Theo Barker and Anthony Sutcliffe 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josef W. Konvitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations