Abstract
Estimates of the distribution of wealth in the rural areas of developing countries are virtually unknown. In some countries there are of course data on the distribution of land, but even where such data exist, they are woefully inadequate. First, land is measured in physical units. Adjustments seldom are made to take differences in the quality of land into account, although rough corrections occasionally are made to distinguish between irrigated and unirrigated land. Almost never is land measured in value terms and hence all factors apart from irrigation which affect the economic value of land are ignored. Second, where data exist, they often refer to the distribution of operational holdings rather than to units of ownership. In countries where large farms are broken up into small tenant holdings, data on the distribution of operational holdings tend to understate the degree of inequality in land ownership. This problem is compounded in countries where large landowners own more than one farm, often in different localities. Third, the data on the distribution of land usually focus on the distribution among tenant cultivators or, alternatively, among landowners. In both cases landless agricultural wage workers are excluded from consideration. What is needed however are data which refer to the distribution of land (correctly valued) among the entire rural population, including those who possess no land at all as well as small and large landowners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
The method used to impute the value of land from the agricultural income it produces is described in Terry McKinley, The Distribution of Wealth in Rural China, Chapter VI, PhD thesis, University of California, Riverside, 1992.
The aggregate-ranked Gini coefficient is also called a pseudo-Gini coefficient or, in Chapter 1, a concentration ratio.
Respondents to the survey were asked to give both the original value of their fixed productive assets and the current market value. If a household reports the original value of an asset, but fails to report the current value, the original value is multiplied by the average ratio of the current to the original value. This average ratio is the provincial average of the current value of total fixed productive assets to the original value of total fixed productive assets.
Although direct comparisons of the ratio of agricultural income to total income and the ratio of land value to net worth are difficult because of differences in the method of calculation, there is no reason to believe that the weight of land value in net worth, namely, 58.8 per cent, is significantly different from the weight of agricultural income in total income.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Keith Griffin and Zhao Renwei
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKinley, T. (1993). The Distribution of Wealth in Rural China. In: Griffin, K., Renwei, Z. (eds) The Distribution of Income in China. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23026-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23026-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23028-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23026-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)