Skip to main content

Models for Understanding the Relations between Religions

  • Chapter
Inter-Religious Models and Criteria

Abstract

In considering the possibilities of differing models of the relation between the various major religious traditions, we had better ask: From what point of view are we doing the modeling? Are we thinking to be neutral somehow? Or are we standing within a tradition? Or, more nebulously, are we occupying a certain religious position, though not precisely identifying with one tradition? Moreover, are there models which work with some pair or group of religions but do not work with others? And again, are there models which function across religions, but only in relation to sub-traditions within them?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John Hick, An Interpretation of Religion (London: Macmillan, 1989), esp. chap. 14.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudolf Otto, The Idea of the Holy (Oxford: OUP, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. T. Stace, Mysticism and Philosophy (New York: Humanities, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Smart, Worldviews (New York: Scribner, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aldous Huxley, The Perennial Philosophy (New York: Ayer, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. N. Farquhar, the Crown of Hinduism (New York: OUP, 1920).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Or really Brunnerian: see H. Kraemer The Christian Message in a Non-Christian World (Tambaram, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For example D. Z. Phillips, The Concept of Prayer (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A view reminiscent of R. C. Zaehner in his Concordant Discord (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 The Claremont Graduate School

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smart, N. (1993). Models for Understanding the Relations between Religions. In: Inter-Religious Models and Criteria. Library of Philosophy and Religion Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23017-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics