‘Perfectly Unprecedented Arrangements’: Tender Buttons
Written between 1911 and 1914 and divided into three sections — ‘Objects’, ‘Food’ and ‘Rooms’1 — Tender Buttons is a slim volume of prose poems, which Stein later called verbal ‘still lifes’.2 Other of Stein’s works have received a greater quantity of critical attention (Three Lives and The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas in particular), but none has provoked more imaginative — even fevered — interpretive activity than Tender Buttons. Because Tender Buttons is so full of interpretive clues, many readers, trained by years of symbol hunting, dutifully play detective, beginning with the question ‘What is this about?’, assembling the various clues into an interpretive system and arriving, finally, at the ‘meaning’ of the text.
KeywordsNickel Manifold Rubber Assure Stein
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Doris Wright, ‘Woman as Eros-Rose in Gertrude Stein’s Tender Buttons and Contemporaneous Portraits’, Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 74 (1986) 34–40;Google Scholar
- Catharine R. Stimpson, ‘The Somagrams of Gertrude Stein’, in Critical Essays on Gertrude Stein, ed. Michael J. Hoffman (G.K. Hall, 1986), pp. 183–196; Shari Benstock, Women of the Left Bank, pp. 161–2;Google Scholar
- Neil Schmitz, Of Huck and Alice: Humorous Writing in American Literature (University of Minnesota Press, 1983), pp. 162–199;Google Scholar
- William Gass, ‘Gertrude Stein: Her Escape from Protective Language’, in Fictions and the Figures of Life (Alfred A. Knopf, 1971), pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
- 14.Barbara Hernnstein Smith, ‘Contingencies of Value’, in Canons, ed. Robert von Hallberg (University of Chicago Press, 1983), p. 17. Smith’s comments about classification, function and value appear in an essay concerned with canonical and non-canonical texts and with the system of literary evaluation by which the canon is established and questioned. Her central point is that literary value is mutable, diverse (14) and ‘radically contingent’ (18). I believe that Tender Buttons makes a similar ‘point’ and that it ‘argues’ implicitly for a system of classification in which a text like Tender Buttons would have value in spite of the fact that it does not serve the same function as an ode by John Keats, for example.Google Scholar