Evaluating Cabinet Decision-Making

  • Svein Eriksen

Abstract

The cabinet is a multi-purpose body. Its main activities are coordination, innovation, and management.Coordination is a manifest requirement, but it is often difficult to achieve, given the multiplicity and complexity of the governmental tasks.Innovation is regarded as one of the tasks of cabinets, since these are deemed to be instruments of social change: a new government often means a new beginning. The view that the cabinet is an innovating agent is connected to the fact that in most Western European countries the cabinet has a virtual monopoly of initiation of legislation. All major political reforms are prepared in the ministries and presented to parliament after discussion in cabinet. The idea that a change of cabinet also means a break is helped by party political rhetoric, especially at election time, when party leaders claim that a new era is about to begin.

Keywords

Europe Petroleum Expense Arena Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See Chapter 8. It is important to remember that all ministers want more technical knowledge.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. L. Thiébault (1988), p. 86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Dunleavy and R. A. W. Rhodes (1990), p. 19.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Eriksen (1988b).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Seymour-Ure (1970-1), pp. 196-207.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. B. Andeweg (1985), p. 152.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Gerlich and W. C. Müller (1988), p. 148.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Westerlund (1990).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. -L. Thiébault (1988), p. 101.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. G. Christensen (1985), p. 136.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NOU 1982:3 Makturedningens sluttrapport.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Steel and D. Heald (1984), pp. 13-14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Rose (1980), p. 11.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Rye Olsen (1990).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Rose (1969). P. Haungs (1973). W. C. Müller and W. Philipp (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. P. Olsen (1988), p. 10. H. Döring in R. S. Katz (ed) (1987). W. Müller and W. Philipp (1987).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Van Putten (1982), p. 191. T. Larsson (1988b).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Headey (1974).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Rose (1971), p. 400.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Headey (1974), p. 278.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. M. Lee (1982). R. A. Chapman (1983). J. P. Olsen (1988).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. G. Christensen (1990).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. P. Olsen (1988). G. Rye Olsen (1990).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. March and J. P. Olsen (1983). J. Salomon (1981).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. Scharpf (1985), p. 8.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. March and J. P. Olsen (1983).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Hoskyns (1983), p. 147.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Seymour-Ure (1970-1).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Government White Paper, Cmnd. 4506 (1970), p. 5.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. Bartolini (1982), p. 210.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Andeweg (1988a), p. 144.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Pollitt (1984).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Larsson (1990), p. 182.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Seymour-Ure (1970-71), p. 204.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    See for instance W. Parsons (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svein Eriksen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations