Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysing Innovation Output Indicators: The US Experience

  • Chapter
New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement

Abstract

The state of knowledge regarding technological change has generally been shaped by the nature of the data which were available to scholars for analysis. Such data have always been incomplete and, at best, represented only a proxy measure reflecting some aspect of the process of technological change. Simon Kuznets observed in 1962 that the greatest obstacle to understanding the economic role of technological change was a clear inability of scholars to measure it. More recently, Cohen and Levin (1989) warned:

A fundamental problem in the study of innovation and technical change in industry is the absence of satisfactory measures of new knowledge and its contribution to technological progress. There exists no measure of innovation that permits readily interpretable cross-industry comparisons. Moreover, the value of an innovation is difficult to assess, particularly when the innovation is embodied in consumer products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1987) ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4) (November), pp.567–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1988a)’Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review78(4), pp.678–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1988b) ‘R&D and Small Firms’, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial Law, Committee on the Judiciary, US House of Representatives (24 February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1989) ‘Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity’, Kyklos, 42, pp. 171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1991) ‘R&D, Firm Size and Innovative Activity’, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds) Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ), pp. 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch (1990) Innovation and Small Firms (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., David B. Audretsch and Maryann P. Feldman (1992) ‘Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment’, American Economic Review, 82(1) (March), 363–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., David B. Audretsch, and Maryann P. Feldman (1993) ‘R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Zoltan J. Acs (1991) ‘Innovation and Size at the Firm Level’, Southern Economic Journal, 57(3) (January), pp.739–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, William L. and John T. Scott (1987) Market Structure and Technological Change ( London and New York: Harwood Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, Alok K. and Michael R. Halperin, (1990) ‘Technical Performance and Firm Size: Analysis of Patents and Publications of U.S. Firms’, Small Business Economics, 2 (3), pp. 183–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. and Richard C. Levin (1989) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. II ( Amsterdam: North-Holland ), pp. 1059–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. and Steven Klepper (1991) ‘Firm Size versus Diversity in the Achievement of Technological Advance’, Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ), pp. 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. and Steven Klepper (1992) ‘The Tradeoff between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress’, Small Business Economics, 4(1) (March), pp.1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Keith L. and Theodore J. Gordon (1984) Characterization of Innovations Introduced on the U.S. Market in 1982The Futures Group, prepared for the US Small Business Administration under Contract No. SBA-6050-OA-82 (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Franklin M. and Peter Temin (1973) ‘Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?’ Journal of Political Economy81 (January/February), pp.56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John K. (1956) American Capitalism: The Concept of Coutervailing Power, rev. edn ( Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellman Research Associates (1976) Indicators of International Trends in Technological Innovationprepared for the National Science Foundation (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellman Research Associates (1982) The Relationship between Industrial Concentration, Firm Size, and Technological Innovationprepared for the Office of Advocacy, US Small Business Administration, Award no. SBA2633-OA-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, Henry G. (1968) ‘The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug and Petroleum Industries’, Journal of Political Economy, 76 (4), pp. 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Siegfried (1989) ‘Zur Erfassung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungstätigkeit durch Patente’, Naturwissensschaften, 76 (4), pp. 156–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Siegfried and Georg Potkowik (1990) Patente und Wirtschaftszweige: Zusammenführung der Internationalen Patentklassifikation und der Systematik der Wirtschaftszweige ( Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilliches, Zvi (1979) ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10 (Spring), pp. 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilliches, Zvi (1990) ‘Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4) (December), pp.1661–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., Zvi Griliches and Jerry A. Hausman (1986), ‘Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?’, International Economic Review, 27 (June), pp. 265–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Adam B. (1986) ‘Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value’, American Economic Review, 76(5) (December), 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Adam, (1989) ‘Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review, 79(5) (December), 957–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred (1987) ‘Measuring R&D in Small Firms: How Much Are We Missing?’, Journal of Industrial Economics36(2) (December), pp.253–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred (1989) ‘Firm Size and Innovation: Observations in Dutch Manufacturing Industry’, Small Business Economics, 1(1), pp.215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred (1991) ‘Firm Size and Innovation: Reply to Scheirer’ Small Business Economics, 3(2), pp.157–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred and Bart Verspagen (1989), ‘R&D and Market Structure: The Impact of Measurement and Aggregation Problems’, Small Business Economics, 1 (4), pp. 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, Alfred, Tom P. Poot and Jeroen O.N. Reijnen (1991) ‘Formal and Informal R&D and Firm Size: Survey Results from the Netherlands’, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp.84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Meier and John T. Scott (1982) ‘Scale Economies in Research and Development: The Schumpeterian Hypothesis’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 30 (March), pp. 239–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N. and Barry Bozeman (1991) ‘Innovative Behaviour in Small-sized Firms’, Small Business Economics, 3(3), pp. 179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N. and John Rees (1990) ‘Firm Size, University Based Research, and the Returns to R&D’, Small Business Economics, 2(1), pp. 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1968) Industrial Research and Technological Change ( New York: W. W. Norton for the Cowles Foundation for Research Economics, at Yale University ), pp. 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1984) ‘Comment on Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Interindustry Technology Flows’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D Patents, and Productivity ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press ), pp. 462–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Dennis C. (1967) ‘The Firm Decision Process: An Econometric Investigation’, Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1), pp. 57–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (1975) Science Indicators, 1974 ( Washington, DC: Goverment Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1986) National Patterns of Science and Technology Resources 1986 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, Ariel and Zvi Griliches (1980) ‘Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Report’, Economics Letters5, pp.377–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, Ariel and Zvi Griliches (1984) ‘Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity ( Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli, E. and A. Sterlachinni (1990) ‘Innovation, Formal vs. Informal R&D, and Firm Size: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms’, Small Business Economics, 2 (2), pp. 223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheirer, Willaim K. (1989) ‘SBA Innovation Data Base: A Comment’, Small Business Economics, 1(3), p. 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheirer, William (1991) ‘Firm Size and Innovation: A Comment’, Small Business Economics, 3(2), June, pp.155–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1965) ‘Size of Firm, Oligopoly and Research: A Comment’ Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science31 (May), pp.256–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1977) The Economic Effects of Compulsory Patent Licensing (New York: New York University Graduate School of Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1983) ‘The Propensity to Patent’, International Journal of Industrial Organization1 (March), pp.107–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1991) ‘Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem’, in: Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1950) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edn, ( New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, Joachim and Klaus F. Zimmerman (1991) ‘A Poisson Model of Patenting and Firm Structure in Germany’, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp.109–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, William G. (1979) The Economics of Industrial Organization (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soete, Luc L. G. (1979) ‘Firm Size and Inventive Activity: The Evidence Reconsidered’, European Economic Review, 12, pp. 319–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Zoltan J. Acs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. SEO, Foundation for Economic Research, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Alfred Kleinknecht (Senior Economist) (Senior Economist)

  2. EC Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Ispra, Italy

    Donald Bain (Principal Scientist) (Principal Scientist)

Copyright information

© 1993 Alfred Kleinknecht and Donald Bain

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (1993). Analysing Innovation Output Indicators: The US Experience. In: Kleinknecht, A., Bain, D. (eds) New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22892-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation