Skip to main content

Revenue Farming and the Changing State in Southeast Asia

  • Chapter
The Rise and Fall of Revenue Farming

Part of the book series: Studies in the Economies of East and South-East Asia ((SEESEA))

Abstract

The study of revenue farming is a powerful means of focusing on the state. The state claims the sovereign and sole right to levy certain taxes and to charge for certain goods and services in order to maintain and extend itself. However, the state may choose for whatever reason not to undertake the actual collection of some revenues itself but instead farm out this task. In other words, the state may grant a private contractor the exclusive right for a specified period to collect a tax or provide certain goods and services in a particular territory. If we look at the farm as a business, we can say that the private contractor, or ‘farmer’, paid the state an agreed fixed rent for the enjoyment of this right. Yet a farm was more than a business. Arguing that the farmer collected ‘for and in the name of the State’, Abendanon (1886, pp. 525–7) drew the conclusion that rather than the farmer paying the state in the form of rent it was more correct to regard the state as paying the farmer for his services by requiring him to hand over only an agreed amount rather than all that he collected. Either way, of course, the driving force behind revenue fanning — the incentive that propelled men to become revenue farmers — was the same: the farmer was able to keep for himself whatever money he collected over and above the amount he had to pay the state. Nevertheless, Abendanon’s conception of a farm highlights the fact that the farmer, though a private merchant working in his own interests, was also acting on behalf of the state or at least was expected to do so. Farmers were thereby granted certain powers to carry out their work. There was, in short, a division of authority between the state and the farmer.

Although I have in no way done justice to their perceptive criticisms and many suggestions regarding sources and alternative approaches, I would very much like to thank Bruce Cruikshank, Howard Dick, Christine Dobbin, Bob Elson, John Gullick, Brian Head and Nick Knight for reading earlier versions of this chapter. I would also like to thank the Australian Research Council for a grant that made possible the collection of materials in the Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 John G. Butcher and H. W. Dick

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butcher, J. (1993). Revenue Farming and the Changing State in Southeast Asia. In: Butcher, J., Dick, H. (eds) The Rise and Fall of Revenue Farming. Studies in the Economies of East and South-East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22877-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics