Skip to main content

Technical Change as Cultural Evolution

  • Chapter
Learning and Technological Change

Abstract

This chapter develops the following themes. First, technical advance needs to be understood as a cultural evolutionary process. Models by economists that treat it as a maximizing process miss the point, as do the models that treat it as just like a model in biology. Second, what provides private incentive to invest in research and development (R&D) is that the fruits are at least partly a private good. However, new technology has a public aspect as well, and this is what makes the evolutionary process cultural. As a result, technology advances through the work of a community of technologists who are both rivals and colleagues. Third, to a good first approximation the private part of technology is the specific application, and the public part generic. This is so for two reasons: the means that firms have to protect their inventions largely shield the specifics, but the generic aspects of their inventions are almost impossible to protect; and in addition, universities are scientific and technical societies and are in the business of making generic knowledge public. Fourth, technological communities (and the technological change they engender) have become more science based, and more transnational, in recent times. The consequences are profound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cohen, W. and Levin, R. (1989) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.Cand Levinthal, D. (1989) ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D’ The Economic Journal (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1982) ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories’, Research Policy (Summer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, K. (1988) Creating the Computer (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (1986) Biotechnology: The University Industrial Complex (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, E. (1977) ‘The Nature and Function of the Patent System’, Journal of Law and Economics (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, E. (1983) ‘A Bibliometric Analysis of Pharmaceutical Research’, Research Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N. (1989) ‘Successful Commercialization in the Chemical Process Industries’, Stanford University, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. and Reiss, P. (1988) ‘Cost-reducing and Demand-increasing R & D with Spillovers’, Rand Journal of Economics (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1987) ‘Appropriating the Returns to Industrial R & D’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S. and Rumelt, R. (1982) ‘Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency Under Competition’, Bell Journal of Economics (Autumn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., Rapoport, J., Schnee, J., Wagner, S. and Hamburger, M. (1971) Research and Development in the Modern Corporation (New York: Norton).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mergis, R. and Nelson, R. (1990) ‘The Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1989) Technology and the Prospect of Economic Growth (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. and Frame, J. (1989) ‘The Growth of Japanese Science and Technology’, Science (11 August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. and Noma, F. (1985) ‘Is Technology Becoming Science?’, Scienceometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1982), ‘The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1988) ‘Modelling the Connections in the Cross Section Between Technical Advance and R & D Intensity’, Rand Journal of Economics (Autumn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.Nand Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (1977) America by Design (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. (1969) Innovation, Growth, and Welfare (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1987) ‘On the Nature of Technology’, Inaugural lecture given at the University of Sussex, 23 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. de S. (1965) ‘Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study in Statistical Historiography’, Technology and Culture, 6 (Autumn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J. (1989) ‘The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion’, in R. Schmalensee, and R. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Innovation (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990) ‘Endogenous Technical Change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976) Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1990) ‘Why do Companies do Basic Research with their own Money?’ Research Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. (1959) Patents and the Corporation (Boston, privately printed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1950) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper and Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotchmer, S. (1991) ‘Standing on the Shoulders of Giants’, Journal of Economic Perspectives (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1986) ‘Profiting From Technological Innovation’, Research Policy (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackray, A. (1982) ‘University-Industry Connections and Chemical Research: An Historical Perspective’, University—Industry Research Relationships (Washington, DC: National Science Board).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (1989) The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, S., with Bertin, G. and Pavitt, K. (1985) ‘Patents and Multinational Corporations: Results from Questionnaires’ World Patent Information (Autumn).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 Ross Thomson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, R.R. (1993). Technical Change as Cultural Evolution. In: Thomson, R. (eds) Learning and Technological Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22855-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics