Abstract
This chapter develops the following themes. First, technical advance needs to be understood as a cultural evolutionary process. Models by economists that treat it as a maximizing process miss the point, as do the models that treat it as just like a model in biology. Second, what provides private incentive to invest in research and development (R&D) is that the fruits are at least partly a private good. However, new technology has a public aspect as well, and this is what makes the evolutionary process cultural. As a result, technology advances through the work of a community of technologists who are both rivals and colleagues. Third, to a good first approximation the private part of technology is the specific application, and the public part generic. This is so for two reasons: the means that firms have to protect their inventions largely shield the specifics, but the generic aspects of their inventions are almost impossible to protect; and in addition, universities are scientific and technical societies and are in the business of making generic knowledge public. Fourth, technological communities (and the technological change they engender) have become more science based, and more transnational, in recent times. The consequences are profound.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cohen, W. and Levin, R. (1989) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
Cohen, W.Cand Levinthal, D. (1989) ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D’ The Economic Journal (September).
Dosi, G. (1982) ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories’, Research Policy (Summer)
Hamm, K. (1988) Creating the Computer (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).
Kenney, M. (1986) Biotechnology: The University Industrial Complex (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).
Kitch, E. (1977) ‘The Nature and Function of the Patent System’, Journal of Law and Economics (October).
Koenig, E. (1983) ‘A Bibliometric Analysis of Pharmaceutical Research’, Research Policy.
Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N. (1989) ‘Successful Commercialization in the Chemical Process Industries’, Stanford University, Mimeo.
Levin, R. and Reiss, P. (1988) ‘Cost-reducing and Demand-increasing R & D with Spillovers’, Rand Journal of Economics (Winter).
Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1987) ‘Appropriating the Returns to Industrial R & D’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987–3.
Lippman, S. and Rumelt, R. (1982) ‘Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency Under Competition’, Bell Journal of Economics (Autumn).
Mansfield, E., Rapoport, J., Schnee, J., Wagner, S. and Hamburger, M. (1971) Research and Development in the Modern Corporation (New York: Norton).
Mergis, R. and Nelson, R. (1990) ‘The Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review (May).
Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1989) Technology and the Prospect of Economic Growth (Cambridge University Press).
Narin, F. and Frame, J. (1989) ‘The Growth of Japanese Science and Technology’, Science (11 August).
Narin, F. and Noma, F. (1985) ‘Is Technology Becoming Science?’, Scienceometrics.
Nelson, R. (1982), ‘The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (August).
Nelson, R. (1988) ‘Modelling the Connections in the Cross Section Between Technical Advance and R & D Intensity’, Rand Journal of Economics (Autumn).
Nelson, R.Nand Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press).
Noble, D. (1977) America by Design (New York: Knopf).
Nordhaus, W. (1969) Innovation, Growth, and Welfare (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Pavitt, K. (1987) ‘On the Nature of Technology’, Inaugural lecture given at the University of Sussex, 23 June.
Price, D. de S. (1965) ‘Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study in Statistical Historiography’, Technology and Culture, 6 (Autumn).
Reinganum, J. (1989) ‘The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion’, in R. Schmalensee, and R. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Innovation (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
Romer, P. (1990) ‘Endogenous Technical Change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98.
Rosenberg, N. (1976) Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press).
Rosenberg, N. (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press).
Rosenberg, N. (1990) ‘Why do Companies do Basic Research with their own Money?’ Research Policy.
Scherer, F. (1959) Patents and the Corporation (Boston, privately printed).
Schumpeter, J.A. (1950) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper and Row).
Scotchmer, S. (1991) ‘Standing on the Shoulders of Giants’, Journal of Economic Perspectives (Winter).
Teece, D. (1986) ‘Profiting From Technological Innovation’, Research Policy (December).
Thackray, A. (1982) ‘University-Industry Connections and Chemical Research: An Historical Perspective’, University—Industry Research Relationships (Washington, DC: National Science Board).
Thomson, R. (1989) The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press).
Von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press).
Wyatt, S., with Bertin, G. and Pavitt, K. (1985) ‘Patents and Multinational Corporations: Results from Questionnaires’ World Patent Information (Autumn).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Ross Thomson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nelson, R.R. (1993). Technical Change as Cultural Evolution. In: Thomson, R. (eds) Learning and Technological Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22855-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22855-3_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22857-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22855-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)