Abstract
Literate societies generally measure the effectiveness and social value of schoolteachers in terms of their success in educating the next generation. Despite being entrusted with the nation’s future, teachers in such societies are not highly regarded, since their expertise is often perceived by the community as little more than surrogate parenting, and their classroom role is believed to be easily within the grasp of any literate adult. Ultimately, the status of teachers, like that of any profession, is conditioned by public expectations.1 This was as true of Imperial Russia as anywhere else, but in Russia expectations of teachers went well beyond the classroom. The demands imposed on them were considerably weightier, more urgent and often conflicting, so much so that the very process of defining the place of teachers in Russia, particularly in the rural community, came to involve not only professional and educational issues, but was above all a political contest involving the disparate social and political forces contending for that country’s future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. A. Jackson, ‘Professions and Professionalization’, in J. A. Jackson (ed.), Professions and Professionalization (Cambridge, England, 1970) p. 14;
T. Leggatt, ‘Teaching as a Profession’, in Jackson, ibid., pp. 153–78;
Amitai Etzioni (ed.), The Semi-Professions and their Organization (New York, 1969) especially the preface.
For a convenient summary of the relevant anthropological literature, see Jack M. Potter, May N. Diaz and George M. Foster (eds) Peasant Society: A Reader (Boston, 1967) pp. 164–7, 279–81;
see also Eric Wolf, Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century (New York, 1969) pp. 286–9.
Leopold H. Haimson, ‘The Problem of Social Identities in Early Twentieth Century Russia’, Slavic Review, 47 (1) (1988) pp. 12–20.
Ben Eklof, ‘The Village and the Outsider: The Rural Teacher in Russia, 1864–1914’, Slavic and European Education Review, 1 (1979) pp. 1–19;
Eklof, ‘Peasant Sloth Reconsidered: Strategies of Education and Learning before the Revolution’, Journal of Social History, 14 (3) (1981) pp. 355–80;
Eklof, Russian Peasant Schools: Officialdom, Village Culture and Popular Pedagogy, 1861–1914 (Berkeley, Calif., 1986);
Terence Emmons and Wayne S. Vucinich (eds), The Zemstvo in Russia: An Experiment in Local Self-Government (Cambridge, 1982).
For some sense of Third Element isolation, see the following memoirs: V. I. Dmitrieva, ‘Po derevniam: iz zametok “epidimicheskogo vracha”’, Vestnik Evropy, 10 (1896) pp. 520–65; 11 (1896) pp. 131–76;
S. Grin, ‘Voina s batsillami (iz zametok zhenshchiny-vracha)’, Vestnik Evropy, 5 (1900) pp. 589–654;
A. V. Peshekhonov, ‘Krizis v zemskoi statistike’, Russkoe bogatstvo, 12 (1901) pp. 167–89;
S. Volkov, Nor on, a vse spasibo emu, of nego kormimsia (iz nabrosok zemskogo statistika)’, Russkaia mysl’, 8 (1902) pp. 59–71.
See Allen Sinel, ‘The Campaign for Universal Primary Education in Russia, 1890–1904’, Jahrbucher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 30 (4) (1982) pp. 481–507;
B. B. Veselovskii, Istoriia zemstva za sorok let, 4 vols (St Petersburg, 1909–11) I.
Khronika vnutrennei zhizni’, Russkoe bogatstvo, 4 (section 2) (1900) pp. 186–8.
See Scott J. Seregny, Russian Teachers and Peasant Revolution: The Politics of Education in 1905 (Bloomington, Indiana, 1989) pp. 84–98.
V. Denisov, ‘Znachenie uchitel’skikh kursov po otzyvam zemskikh uchitelei’, Obrazovanie, 7 (section 2) (1904) pp. 42–7.
Jacob Walkin, The Rise of Democracy in Pre-Revolutionary Russia (New York, 1962).
Barnett Singer, ‘The Teacher as Notable in Brittany, 1880–1914’, French Historical Studies, 9 (1976) pp. 635–59
Eugen Weber, Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914 (Stanford, 1976) pp. 317–18.
V. Serebriakov, ‘Sovremennoe sostoianie russkoi derevni i eia nuzhdy, po otzyvam sel’skikh zhitelei’, Saratovskaia zemskaia nedelia, 10–12 (section 3) (1905) pp. 5–8.
See E. I. Kiriukhina, ‘Vserossiiskii Krest’ianskii Soiuz y 1905 g.’, Istoricheskie zapiski, 50 (1955) pp. 95–141;
Scott J. Seregny, ‘A Different Type of Peasant Movement: The Peasant Unions in the Russian Revolution of 1905’, Slavic Review, 47 (1) (1988) pp. 51–67 and ‘Peasants and Politics: Peasant Unions during the 1905 Revolution’, in Esther Kingston-Mann and Timothy Mixter (eds), Peasant Economy, Culture and Politics in European Russia, 1800–1921 (Princeton, NJ, 1991) pp. 341–77;
Teodor Shanin, Russia, 1905–1907: Revolution as a Moment of Truth (New Haven, Conn., 1986). Diana A. Kolesnichenko of the Academy of Sciences (Moscow) is preparing a major monograph on the peasant unions.
B. V., ‘Pedagogicheskii mir i Gosudarstvennaia Duma’, Russkaia shkola, 4 (1906) pp. 123–38;
Terence Emmons, The Formation of Political Parties and the First National Elections in Russia (Cambridge, Mass., 1983) p. 349.
John F. Hutchinson, Politics and Public Health in Revolutionary Russia, 1890–1918 (Baltimore, Maryland, 1990) argues that similar trends affected zemstvo medicine after 1905.
Kn. K. Kekuatov, Prava zemstva v oblasti shkol’nogo dela’, Zemskoe delo, 23 (1914) pp. 1409–12; ‘K voprosu o snosheniiakh zemskikh uchitelei s zemskoi upravoi’, Dlia narodnogo uchitelia, 11–12 (1914) pp. 18–19;
E. Zviagintsev, ‘Ministerskii tsirkuliar o poriadke naznacheniia narodnykh uchitelei’, Uchitel’ i shkola, 5 (1914) pp. 1–7;
Count Paul N. Ignatiev, Dmitry M. Odinetz and Paul J. Novgorodtsev, Russian Schools and Universities in the War (New Haven, Conn., 1929) pp. 18–22.
A. A. Parshinskii, ‘Uchitel’stvo za gody pervoi revoliutsii i reaktsii’, Otrazhenie pervoi russkoi revoliutsii v S.-Dvinskoi gubernii (Velikii Ustiug, 1926) pp. 78–9.
B. Veselovskii, ‘Nekotorye novye iavleniia v zemskoi zhizni’, Zemskoe delo, 10 (1916) pp. 487–8;
M. Tikhomirov, ‘Sel’skie prosvetitel’nye obshchestva’, Dlia narodnogo uchitelia, 1 (1913) pp. 35–6. My research on the post-1905 period is ongoing and so these conclusions are tentative.
N. V. Chekhov, ‘Russkii uchitel’ i revoliutsiia’, Narodnyi uchitel’, 5–6 (1918) pp. 3–5;
E. Vakhterova, ‘Iz zhizni’, Uchitel’, 1 (1918) pp. 29–31.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 International Council for Soviet and East European Studies, and Ben Eklof
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seregny, S.J. (1993). Teachers, Politics and the Peasant Community in Russia, 1895–1918. In: Eklof, B. (eds) School and Society in Tsarist and Soviet Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22817-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22817-1_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22819-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22817-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)