Abstract
One of the first questions to which Almond’s newly-coined concept of political culture was applied was that of the relationship between political culture and democracy, and this has indeed continued to be a major area of political culture research. Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba’s The Civic Culture, published in 1963,1 was the original entry into this field, and has remained a benchmark for much subsequent research. At the same time, it has provided an inviting target for criticism. Moreover, the substantial body of data it gathered has been utilized by other authors in arguments that diverge somewhat from Almond and Verba’s. These are good reasons for according The Civic Culture some prominence in the present chapter, but, in view of its familiarity, not yet perhaps sufficient ones. Our argument will be that the study attempts to combine what were termed in the Introduction comparative and sociological uses of political culture. Critics have not noticed this fact, and their critiques have in consequence been somewhat partial. The aim of this chapter is, however, not simply to provide a more complete analysis and critique of The Civic Culture. It is to illustrate the effects of what we will argue is a characteristic combination of sociological and comparative uses of political culture. A perspective will thereby be developed that assists in the evaluation of the literature, critical and otherwise, that in one way or another has been provoked by Almond and Verba’s study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963; abridged edn Boston: Little, Brown, 1965, repr. Newbury Park, CA and London: Sage, 1989). In the present chapter, page references to this book will be made in parentheses in the text. References will be to the abridged edition, since it is the most widely available; it differs from the Princeton edition principally in omitting a description of the methodological apparatus of the study.
Brian M. Barry, Sociologists, Economists and Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), p. 51.
W. G. Runciman, ‘Some Recent Contributions to the Theory of Democracy’, European Journal of Sociology 6, 1965, 174–185, p. 183.
Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba (eds), The Civic Culture Revisited (Boston: Little, Brown, 1980, repr. Newbury Park, CA and London: Sage, 1989)
Sidney Verba, ‘Germany: The Remaking of Political Culture’, in Lucian W. Pye and Sidney Verba (eds), Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965), p. 133.
Geoffrey K. Roberts, ‘“Normal” or “Critical”?: Progress Reports on the Condition of West Germany’s Political Culture’, European Journal of Political Research 12, 1984, 423–431. For an interesting comparison with the former East Germany which also emphasizes the growth of ‘alternative’ political culture, see Christiane Lemke, ‘New Issues in the Politics of the German Democratic Republic: A Question of Political Culture?’, Journal of Communist Studies 2, 1986, 351–358. See also Henry Krisch, ‘Changing Political Culture and Political Stability in the German Democratic Republic’, Studies in Comparative Communism 19, 1986, 41–53.
Walter A. Rosenbaum, Political Culture (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1975).
Ronald Inglehart, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), ch. 1, also published as Ronald Inglehart, ‘The Renaissance of Political Culture’, American Political Science Review 82, 1988, 1203–1230.
Carole Pateman, for instance, suggests that ‘throughout The Civic Culture it is assumed that there are no problems in talking about the political culture or the civic culture of Britain and the United States’. Carole Pateman, ‘The Civic Culture: A Philosophic Critique’, in Almond and Verba, The Civic Culture Revisited, p. 76. Michael Mann also characterizes The Civic Culture as a ‘consensus theory’ of society, in Michael Mann, ‘The Social Cohesion of American Liberal Democracy’, American Sociological Review 35, 1970, 423–439. Bob Jessop writes of ‘the temptation to talk of the political culture and its effects in any given society’ and the necessity of instead specifying ‘exactly what orientations… are related to which actions among which members of society’. R. D. Jessop, ‘Civility and Traditionalism in English Political Culture’, British Journal of Political Science 1, 1971, 1–24, p. 21. Jessop further asserts that it is an assumption of Almond and Verba’s that consensus supports stability, and argues that the study fails to recognize ‘the implications of inequalities in the distribution of power for the relevance of consensus in producing stability’. Bob Jessop, Traditionalism, Conservatism and British Political Culture (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1974), p. 53. This position is spelt out further in Bob Jessop, Social Order, Reform and Revolution: A Power, Exchange and Institutionalization Perspective (London: Macmillan, 1972), p. 78: ‘The greater the structural differentiation and power hierarchization, the less the need for consensus and the more the need for institutional integration.’
For a survey of this debate, see Paul G. Lewis, ‘Legitimation and Political Crises: East European Developments in the Post-Stalin Period’, in Paul G. Lewis (ed.), Eastern Europe: Political Crisis and Legitimation (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1
Nicholas Abercrombie and Bryan S. Turner, ‘The Dominant Ideology Thesis’, British Journal of Sociology 29, 1978, 149–170, p. 159.
Quentin Skinner, ‘The Empirical Theorists of Democracy and Their Critics: A Plague on Both Their Houses’, Political Theory 1, 1973, 287–306, pp. 298— 304.
Carole Pateman, ‘Criticizing Empirical Theorists of Democracy: A Comment on Skinner’, Political Theory 2, 1974, 215–218, pp. 216f. Other writers who have seen The Civic Culture as a covert justification of the political status quo in Britain and the United States, apart from Barry, include James A. Bill and Robert L. Hardgrave, Jr, Comparative Politics: The Quest for Theory (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1981), pp. 90f. Pateman’s critique is found also in Carole Pateman, ‘Political Culture, Political Structure and Political Change’, British Journal of Political Science 1, 1971, 291–305.
Copyright information
© 1993 Stephen Welch
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Welch, S. (1993). Political Culture and Democracy. In: The Concept of Political Culture. Macmillan/St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22793-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22793-8_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22795-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22793-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)