Nietzsche’s Critique of Aristotle’s Theory of Tragic Emotions

  • John P. Anton

Abstract

When Nietzsche criticized Aristotle’s views on tragedy in The Birth of Tragedy, he based his attack on two central issues. The first concerned the relationship between the tragic emotions, pity (eleos) and fear (phobos), both being painful experiences, and the aesthetic result of the art of tragedy, ‘the proper pleasure of tragedy’ (he oikeia hedone tes tragodias). Nietzsche claimed that Aristotle made two errors in his formulation of the tragic experience and especially of the concept of catharsis because he misidentified both. Following Bernays, Nietzsche took the latter to mean ‘purgation of emotions’.2

Keywords

Europe Assimilation Peri Ghost Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Anton, John P. 1985. ‘Mythos, Katharsis and the Paradox of Tragedy’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. II, John J. Cleary, ed. (University Press of America), pp. 299–325.Google Scholar
  2. Anton, John P. 1973. ‘Tragic Vision and Philosophic Theoria’, Diotima, I, 11–31; 1975 reprinted with revisions in Philosophy and the Civilizing Arts: Essays Presented to Herbert Schneider on His Eightieth Birthday. Edited and with Introduction by C. Walton and John P. Anton. (Ohio University Press), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  3. Arnott, W. Geoffrey. 1984. ‘Nietzsche’s View of Greek Tragedy’, Arethusa 17/2,135–49.Google Scholar
  4. Arrowsmith, William. 1963. ‘Nietzsche on Classics and Classicists’, Arion, 2/1, 5–18, and 2/2, 5–27.Google Scholar
  5. Benn, A. W. 1914. ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Tragic Emotions’, Mind 23, 84–90.Google Scholar
  6. Bernays, Jacob. 1857. Grundzuge der verlorenen Abhandlung des Aristoteles über Wirkung der Tragödie. (Breslau).Google Scholar
  7. Delauze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Tr. Hugh Tomlinson from the 1962 edition, Presses Universitaires de France. (New York).Google Scholar
  8. Else, Gerald. 1967. Aristotles Poetics: The Argument. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  9. Georgopoulos, N. 1980. ‘Plato and Aristotle: Mimesis, Tragedy and Art’, in Essays in Honor of E. P. Papanoutsos. (Athens, Greece), pp. 199–212.Google Scholar
  10. Magnus, Bernd 1986. ‘Nietzsche’s Philosophy in 1888: The Will to Power and the übermensch’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, XXIV/1, 79–98.Google Scholar
  11. McKeon, Richard. 1952. ‘Literary Criticism and the Concept of Imitation in Antiquity’, in Critics and Criticism. R. C. Crane, ed., (Chicago), pp. 147–75; reprinted from Modern Philology, XXIV (1963), 1–35.Google Scholar
  12. Nietzsche, F. 1967. The Birth of Tragedy and The Case of Wagner. Translated with Commentary by Walter Kaufmann. (New York: Random House, Vintage Books).Google Scholar
  13. Nietzsche, F. 1968. The Will to Power. Translated by Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale, edited, with commentary by W. Kaufmann. (New York: Random House, Vintage Books).Google Scholar
  14. Nietzsche, F. 1968. The Portable Nietzsche. Selected and translated, with an introduction, prefaces, and notes by Walter Kaufmann. (New York: Viking Press).Google Scholar
  15. Nietzsche, F. [n.d]. The Philosophy of Nietzsche. Introduction by W. H. Wright. (New York: Random House, The Modern Library. [Note. The abbreviation ML follows references to pages in Nietzsche’s works included in this edition].Google Scholar
  16. Pap anoutsos, E. P. 1948. ‘La catharsis aristotelicienne’, Eranos 34, 77–93. Papanoutsos, E. P. 1955. La catharsis des passion daprès Aristote, Collection de 1’Institut Francais d’Athènes. (Athens).Google Scholar
  17. Papanoutsos, E. P. 1964. Philosophika Problemata. (Athens, Greece). Part IV, ’Pathematon Katharsis’ no. 219–98.Google Scholar
  18. Weil, H. 1847. ‘über die Wirkung der Tragödie nach Aristoteles’, Verhandlugen der 10. Uversammlung deutcher Philologen und Schulmanner in Basel 1847. (Basel), pp. 131–40.Google Scholar
  19. Whitman, James. 1986. ‘Nietzsche in the Magisterial Tradition of German Classical Philology’, Journal of the History of Ideas, XLVII/3, 453–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Anton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations