A Multinational Corporation or an International Organisation?

  • Rosalyn Higgins

Abstract

The classical definition of international law has been of the body of rules and norms that govern relations between sovereign states. That definition is today still generally agreed to be correct, so far as it goes. But it is insufficient. There are other important international actors whose conduct requires regulating other than by a single, national law. International law today is thus regarded as relevant to the conduct of international organisations, and their relations with each other and with states. And in certain subject areas — for example, the conduct of military actions, the entitlement to human rights — even individuals may have obligations and rights under international law (Higgins, 1978).

Keywords

Egypt ROSAL Concession 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AMF v. Hashim, Law Reports (Appeal Cases) (1991–2) 114–181.Google Scholar
  2. Calon, P, P., “The International Company: Elements of a General Theory’, Journal de Droit International, vol. 88 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. Cmd. 3766, International Convention Respecting the Bank for International Settlements, The Hague, 20 January 1930.Google Scholar
  4. Higgins, R., ‘Conceptual Thinking about the Individual in International Law’, New York Law School Law Review, vol. 24 (1978) 11–29.Google Scholar
  5. Horn, N. (ed.), Legal Problems of Codes of Conduct for Multinational Enterprises (Deventer: Kluwer, 1986).Google Scholar
  6. Ijalaye, D., The Extension of Corporate Personality in International Law (Dobbsferry: Oceana, 1978).Google Scholar
  7. International Tin Council (Immunities and Privileges) Order 1972 (Statutory Instrument 1972, no. 120).Google Scholar
  8. J.H. Rayner Ltd. v. Dept. of Trade, Law Reports (Chancery Division) (1989) 72–253.Google Scholar
  9. Lauterpacht, E., ‘Development of the Law of International Organization’, Recueil des Cours (1976-IV) 377–478.Google Scholar
  10. Maclaine Watson & Co. Ltd. v. Dept. of Trade, Law Reports (Chancery Division) (1989) 72–253.Google Scholar
  11. Maclaine Watson & Co. Ltd. v. International Tin Council, Law Reports (Chancery Division) (1989) 253–308.Google Scholar
  12. Mann, F.A., ‘International Corporations and National Law’, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 42 (1967) 145–147.Google Scholar
  13. Millet, J., All England Law Reports (1987–1) 890–907.Google Scholar
  14. Nourse, L.J., All England Law Reports (1988–1) 359–364.Google Scholar
  15. Seidl-Hohenveldern, I., Corporations in and under International Law (Cambridge: Grotius, 1987).Google Scholar
  16. Staker, C, ‘Diplomatic Protection of Private Business Companies: Determining Corporate Personality for International Law Purposes’, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 61 (1990) 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ‘UN Draft Code of Conduct for Transnational Corporations’, International Legal Materials, vol. 23 (1984) 626–640.Google Scholar
  18. ‘Westland Helicopters Ltd. v. Arab Organization for Industrialization’, International Legal Materials, vol. 23 (1984) 1071–1089.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalyn Higgins

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations