Abstract
In 1337, Edward III held the county of Ponthieu, straddling the Somme. He also bore the title duke of Aquitaine, although the territory he actually held in south-west France was little more than a 50-mile-wide coastal strip between Bayonne and Bordeaux. This was a far cry from the days of Henry II when a king of England held the whole of western France: from the duchy of Normandy in the north, through the counties of Anjou, Maine, Touraine and Poitou to the extensive duchy of Aquitaine in the south, with additional claims to the overlordship of the duchy of Brittany and county of Flanders. Much happened between the twelfth and early fourteenth centuries, but in many ways, the two basic issues of English royal lands in France remained the same: the relationship between the kings of England and France which their tenure generated, and their rightful extent. It was impossible to find a peaceful solution to Anglo-French differences in 1337 because the issues had been so long-running, and had repeatedly proved themselves incapable of lasting settlement. The reasons for this, however, need to be seen in the context of each successive conflict as well as in the problems inherent in the issues themselves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
C. W. Hollister, ‘Normandy, France and the Anglo-Norman regnum’, Speculum, 51 (1976), 202–40 provides a useful discussion of Norman and Angevin attitudes to the payment of homage.
Foedera, I, p. 37; W. L. Warren, King John (first pub. 1961, London: Penguin, 1966), pp. 70–2.
This is not the first known appeal. For an example of 1171 see P. Chaplais, ‘English arguments concerning the feudal status of Aquitaine in the fourteenth century’, BIHR, 21 (1946–8), 203.
M. G. A. Vale, ‘The Gascon Nobility and Crises of Loyalty 1294–1337’, in La ‘France Anglaise’ au Moyen Age. Actes du 111e Congrès des Sociétés Savantes, Poitiers 1986 (Paris: CTHS, 1988), pp. 207–16, and his Angevin Legacy, chapter 4.
M. Wade-Labarge, Gascony. England’s First Colony 1204–1453 (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1980), pp. xii, 13, 54–61 and passim for what follows.
P. Chaplais, ‘The Chancery of Guyenne 1289–1453’, in Studies Presented to Sir Hilary Jenkinson, ed. J. C. Davies (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957), p. 64, reprinted in P. Chaplais, Essays in Medieval Diplomacy and Administration (London: Hambledon Press, 1981); Vale, Angevin Legacy, pp. 141–2.
For the text of the treaty see Foedera, I, ii, p. 45, and English Historical Documents, vol. III, ed. H. Rothwell (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1975), pp. 376–9.
The relevant set of documents is in Foedera, I, ii, pp. 179–80; H. Johnstone, ‘The County of Ponthieu, 1279–1307’, EHR, 29 (1914), 436–7.
Vale, Angevin Legacy, pp. 63–79; E. H. Shealy, ‘The persistence of particularism; the county of Ponthieu in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries’, in Documenting the Past. Essays presented to G. P. Cuttino, ed. J. S. Hamilton and P. J. Bradley (Woodbridge: Boydell, 1989), pp. 34–6, 39–40.
P. Chaplais, ‘Le Duché-pairie de Guyenne: l’hommage et les services féodaux de 1303 à 1337’, Annales du Midi (1958), 147–8, reprinted in his Essays in Medieval Diplomacy.
See for instance The Gascon Calendar of 1322, ed. G. P. Cuttino (London: Camden Society third series 70, 1949).
M. Jusselin, ‘Comment la France se préparait à la Guerre de Cent Ans’, Bibliothèque de L’Ecole des Chartes, 73 (1912), 211, 220–2.
Ex info. P. Contamine. The best discussion in English remains J. Potter, ‘The development and significance of the Salic Law of the French’, EHR , 52 (1937), 235–53.
P. Chaplais, ‘Un message de Jean de Fiennes à Edouard II et le projet de démembrement du royaume de France (janvier 1317)’, Revue du Nord, 43 (1961), 145–8, reprinted in his Essays in Medieval Diplomacy.
H. Stein, ‘Les Conséquences de la bataille de Cassel pour la ville de Bruges et la mort de Guillaume de Deken, son ancien bourgmestre (1328)’, Bulletin de la Commission Royal d’Histoire, 68 (1899), 656.
See also H. Pirenne, ‘La Première tentative faite pour reconnaître Edouard III d’Angleterre comme roi de France (1328)’, Annales de la Société d’Histoire et d’Archaeologie de Gand, 5 (1902), 5–11.
H. S. Lucas, The Low Countries and the Hundred Years War 1326–47 (University of Michigan, 1929, reprinted Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, 1976), p. 80.
Foedera, II, ii, p. 740 (Record edition); R. Nicholson, Edward III and the Scots (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965), pp. 48–9.
Lucas, Low Countries, p. 80; E. Déprez, Les Préliminaires de la Guerre de Cent Ans (Paris, 1902, Geneva: Slatkine-Megariotis Reprints, 1975), p. 39, n.3.
R. Cazelles, La Société politique et la crise de la royauté sous Philippe de Valois (Paris: Librarie d’Argences, 1958)
N. B. Fryde, The Tyranny and Fall of Edward II (Cambridge University Press, 1979).
Rot. Parl., II, p. 67; Nicholson, Edward III and the Scots, p. 100; E. Déprez, ‘La Conférence d’Avignon 1344: l’arbitrage pontificale entre la France et l’Angleterre’, in Essays in Medieval History presented to T. F. Tout, ed. A. G. Little and F. M. Powicke (Manchester University Press, 1925), p. 314.
Les Grandes Chroniques de France, vol. IX, ed. J. Viard (Paris: Société de l’Histoire de France, 1937), pp. 152–3.
C. J. Tyreman, England and the Crusades 1095–1588 (University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 247.
C. J. Tyreman, ‘Philip VI and the recovery of the Holy Land’, EHR, 100 (1985), 25–52, esp. 48.
This may be the purpose of the poem ‘The Vows of the Heron’, usually dated to the end of 1336; Political Poems and Songs, ed. T. Wright (London: Rolls Series, 1859), I, pp. 1–25
discussed in B. J. Whiting, ‘The Vows of the Heron’, Speculum, 20 (1945), 261–78.
R. M. Haines, Archbishop John Stratford (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1986), p. 245; Lucas, Low Countries, p. 194; Foedera, II, iii, p. 165 (19 April 1337).
Geoffrey Le Baker, Chronicon, ed. E. M. Thompson (1889), p. 61.
H. S. Offler, ‘England and Germany at the beginning of the Hundred Years War’, EHR, 44 (1939), 608–31.
M. Prestwich, ‘English Armies in the Early Stages of the Hundred Years War: a Scheme in 1341’, BIHR, 56 (1983), 104–5.
Rot. Parl., II, p. 113: Oeuvres de Froissart, ed. Kervyn de Lettenhove (1867–77, reprinted Osnabruk: Bibio Verlag, 1967), xviii, pp. 129–30.
Murimuth, pp. 116–19. On the political crisis in England in 1341 see Haines, Archbishop John Stratford, and the two recent studies of Edward III’s reign, W. M. Ormrod, The Reign of Edward III (Yale University Press, 1990)
and S. L. Waugh, England in the Reign of Edward III (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
J. J. N. Palmer, ‘The War Aims of the Protagonists’, in K. A. Fowler (ed.), The Hundred Years War (London: Macmillan, 1971), p. 52; Déprez, ‘ La Conférence d’ Avignon’, p. 307. See also Philip VI’s reply to Edward’s challenge of 27 July in Murimuth, pp. 112–14 and Avesbury, pp. 315–16.
F. Bock, ‘Some new documents illustrating the early years of the Hundred Years War (1353–56)’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 15 (1931), 61–70, 84–91.
On the campaigns of Lancaster see K. A. Fowler, The King’s Lieutenant. Henry of Grosmont, first duke of Lancaster (London: Elek Press, 1969).
W. M. Ormrod, ‘Edward III and his family’, Journal of British Studies, 27 (1987), 407–8 and appendix.
J. Le Patourel, ‘Edward III “roi de France et duc de Normandie”, 1356–60’, Revue historique de droit français et étranger, 4e série, 31 (1953), 317–18.
Chronicon Henrici Knighton, ed. J. R. Lumby (London: Rolls Series, 1888–95), II, pp. 94–5.
R. Cazelles, Société politique, noblesse et couronne sous Jean le Bon et Charles V (Geneva and Paris: Droz, 1982), pp. 126–8.
J. Horeau-Dodineau, ‘Les fondements des préférences dynastiques au XIVe siècle d’après quelques lettres de remission’ in La France Anglaise, pp. 113–21; W. M. Ormrod, ‘The double monarchy of Edward III’, Medieval History, 1 (1991), 74.
J. Le Patourel, ‘The Treaty of Brétigny, 1360’, TRHS , 5th series 10 (1960), 19–39. The text of the first does not survive, the second is printed in E. Cosneau, Les Grands traités de la Guerre de Cent Ans (Paris: Picard, 1889), pp. 3–32.
P. Chaplais, ‘Some documents regarding the fulfilment and interpretation of the Treaty of Brétigny’, Camden Miscellany XIX (London: Camden Society, 80, 1952), 6.
For what follows see J. J. N. Palmer, ‘England, France, the papacy and the Flemish succession’, Journal of Medieval History, 2 (1976), pp. 339–64.
P. E. Russell, The English Intervention in Spain and Portugal in the time of Edward III and Richard II (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955), pp. xxi–xxii and chapters 3–7 on the Black Prince’s policies.
P. Morgan, War and Society in Medieval Cheshire 1277–1403 (Manchester: Chetham Society third series 34, 1987), pp. 121–36.
J. J. N. Palmer, England, France and Christendom, 1377–99 (London: Routledge, 1972), pp. 1–2.
Palmer, England, France, p. 1. For discussion of the size, composition and cost of armies in this period see J. W. Sherborne, ‘Indentured retinues and English expeditions to France 1369–89’, EHR, 79 (1964), 718–46, and his ‘The cost of English warfare with France in the later fourteenth century’, BIHR, 50 (1977), 135–50.
For what follows see M. C. E. Jones, Ducal Brittany 1364–1399 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970). He points out (pp. 78 and 90) that seven major and two minor expeditions between 1370 and 1380 involved Brittany or Duke John IV.
E. Perroy, ‘The Anglo-French negotiations at Bruges’, Camden Miscellany XIX (London: Camden Society, 1952), xvi–xvii, 11, 38, 43, 53–5.
There is a useful discussion of the 1377 raids on southern England in E. Searle and R. Burghart, ‘The defense of England and the Peasants’ Revolt’, Viator, 3 (1972), 365–88.
J. A. Tuck, ‘Richard II and the Hundred Years War’, in Politics and Crisis in Fourteenth-Century England, ed. J. Taylor and W. Childs (Gloucester: Alan Sutton, 1990), p. 122.
This is Palmer’s view in ‘The Last Summons of the Feudal Levy in England (1385)’, EHR, 83 (1968), 771–5, but see also N. B. Lewis, ‘The last medieval summons of the English feudal levy, 13 June 1385’, EHR, 68 (1958), 1–26 and his ‘Feudal summons of 1385’, EHR, 100 (1985), 726–43, with Palmer’s reply, pp. 743–6.
J. S. Roskell, The Impeachment of Michael de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, in 1386 in the context of the reign of Richard II (Manchester University Press, 1984), p. 45.
S. Armitage-Smith, John of Gaunt (London: Constable, 1904), pp. 330–2.
J. J. N. Palmer, ‘Articles for a final peace between England and France, 16 June 1393’, BIHR , 39 (1966), 180–5, and ‘ The Anglo-French peace negotiations, 1390–1396’, TRHS, 5th series, 16 (1966), 81–94.
Review of Palmer’s England, France and Christendom in EHR, 88 (1973), 848–53.
Vale, English Gascony 1399–1453 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), p. 32, esp. n.4, and p. 33.
Tuck, ‘Richard II and the Hundred Years War’, pp. 127–8; The Westminster Chronicle 1381–1394, ed. L. C. Hector and B. F. Harvey (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), pp. 516–18; Rot. Parl., III, pp. 315–16.
C. J. Phillpotts, ‘John of Gaunt and English policy towards France 1389–95’, Journal of Medieval History, 16 (1990), 363–86.
C. J. Phillpotts, ‘English policy towards France during the truces 1389–1417’, unpub. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, 1985, p. 30.
See, for instance, Richard’s letter to the duchy of 7 July 1392, Proceedings and Ordinances of the Privy Council, ed. N. H. Nicolas (London: Record Commission, 1834–7), I, p. 79.
Westminster Chronicle, p. 518; Eulogium Historiarum, III, ed. F. S. Haydon (London: Rolls Series, 1863), p. 369.
L. D. Duls, Richard II in the Early Chronicles (The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 1975), pp. 87–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Anne Curry
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curry, A. (1993). Origins and Objectives: Anglo-French Conflict in the Fourteenth Century. In: The Hundred Years War. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22711-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22711-2_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-53176-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22711-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)