Abstract
The transcendent God has for many become an unavailable God. As Jean-Paul Sartre proclaims in his play The Devil and the Good Lord:
I supplicated, I demanded a sign, I sent messages to Heaven, no reply. Heaven ignored my very name. Each minute I wondered what I could be in the eyes of God. Now I know the answer: nothing. God does not see me, God does not hear me, God does not know me… I am going to tell you a colossal joke: God doesn’t exist.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John A.T. Robinson, Honest to God (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1963), p. 43. (Italics mine.)
For a classic presentation of verificationism against theism see A.J. Ayer, Language, Truth, and Logic (New York: Dover, 1952), Introduction, pp. 5–16, and pp. 115–17.
A clear and concise response is offered by George I. Mavrodes in ‘God and Verification’, Canadian Journal of Theology, Vol. 10 (1964), reprinted in
Malcolm L. Diamond and Thomas V. Litzenburg, Jr. (eds), The Logic of God: Theology and Verification (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1975), p. 223.
See also Alvin Plantinga, God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967), pp. 156–68.
John Hick takes a different tack, accepting the verificationist challenge and arguing that the existence of God is a potentially verifiable fact. See Hick, ‘Theology and Verification’, Theology Today, Vol. 17 (1960), reprinted in
Basil Mitchell (ed.), The Philosophy of Religion (Oxford University Press, Oxford Readings in Philosophy, 1971), pp. 53–71.
David Hume, in Nelson Pike (ed.), Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970), Part V (pp. 48 and 51). Cf. Part II (p. 32).
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (London: Macmillan, repr. 1973), pp. 500–24.
Immanuel Kant, in Allen W. Wood and Gertrude M. Clark (eds), Lectures on Philosophical Theology (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press: 1978), p. 161.
Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith (New York: Harper & Row, 1958), p. 89.
(Soren Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments, trans. David F. Swenson, 2nd ed., trans. rev. by Howard V. Hong (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962), p. 25 and p. 26).
Gordon Kaufman, The Theological Imagination (Philadelphiha: Westminster Press, 1981), p. 268 and p. 72.
Gordon D. Kaufman, Theology for a Nuclear Age (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1985; Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985), pp. 37 and 42.
D.Z. Phillips, The Concept of Prayer (New York: Schocken Books, 1966), p. 60.
See also Faith and Philosophical Enquiry (New York: Schocken Books, 1971), p. 29.
D.Z. Phillips, Religion Without Explanation (Oxford: Blackwell, 1976), pp. 148–149.
D.Z. Phillips, review of Reason, Relativism and God in The Times Literary Supplement, 14 November, 1986, p. 1289.
Don Cupitt, Taking Leave of God (New York: Crossroad, 1981), p. 9.
Bertrand Russell and F.C. Copleston, ‘A Debate on the Existence of God’, repr. in John Hick (ed.), The Existence of God (New York: Macmillan, 1964), pp. 173 and 175.
Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, trans. George Eliot (New York: Harper & Row, Harper Torchbooks, 1957), pp. 13–14.
Sigmund Freud, The Failure of an Illusion (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, rev. 1964), p. 50.
Antony Flew, The Presumption of Atheism and Other Philosophical Essays on God, Freedom, and Immortality (London: Elek, 1976), p. 18.
See William James, ‘Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth’, in Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975).
See Kant, Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. Theodore M. Green and Hoyt H. Hudson (New York: Harper & Row, Harper Torchbooks, 1960), p. 142.
Karl Barth, The Epistle to the Romans (Oxford University Press, 6th edn, repr. 1972), p. 435.
John Hick, The Problems of Religious Pluralism (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985), p. 37.
See also Hick, God Has Many Names (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1982).
See Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith (New York: Harper & Row, 1957), p. 20.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Claremont Graduate School
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Runzo, J. (1993). Realism, Non-Realism and Atheism: Why Believe in an Objectively Real God?. In: Runzo, J. (eds) Is God Real?. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22693-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22693-1_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22695-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22693-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)