Skip to main content

Reflections on Realism vs. Non-Realism

  • Chapter
Is God Real?

Part of the book series: Library of Philosophy and Religion ((LPR))

Abstract

Dewi Phillips’s Wittgensteinian animadversions failed to persuade us that there is not an issue of substance between the realists and the non-realists in talk of God. The starkness of Don Cupitt’s anti-realism, his insistence that the history of thought has made belief in an objective God impossible and that Christian God-talk must consequently be wholly reinterpreted in merely human terms, made it absolutely clear that, whatever the difficulties in articulating the ‘grammar’ of traditional Christian God-talk, Cupitt’s version was something very different from what the vast majority of Christian believers and Christian worshippers have thought they were holding and doing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 Claremont Graduate School

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hebblethwaite, B. (1993). Reflections on Realism vs. Non-Realism. In: Runzo, J. (eds) Is God Real?. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22693-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics