Abstract
Dewi Phillips’s Wittgensteinian animadversions failed to persuade us that there is not an issue of substance between the realists and the non-realists in talk of God. The starkness of Don Cupitt’s anti-realism, his insistence that the history of thought has made belief in an objective God impossible and that Christian God-talk must consequently be wholly reinterpreted in merely human terms, made it absolutely clear that, whatever the difficulties in articulating the ‘grammar’ of traditional Christian God-talk, Cupitt’s version was something very different from what the vast majority of Christian believers and Christian worshippers have thought they were holding and doing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Claremont Graduate School
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hebblethwaite, B. (1993). Reflections on Realism vs. Non-Realism. In: Runzo, J. (eds) Is God Real?. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22693-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22693-1_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22695-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22693-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)