Abstract
In a sense even more fundamental than is the case for her younger contemporary, Elena Gan, Mariya Zhukova’s life1 and works have been ‘hidden from history’. Where Mirsky makes a few rather condescending remarks about Gan, he is completely silent on the subject of her more prolific fellow writer. The situation is no better in the much more recent Cambridge History of Russian Literature of 1989 which also has not a single reference to Zhukova, although a number of minor male prosaicists of the period feature. (Richard Stites also fails to mention her.) Finally, however, this silence is ending. Zhukova’s major works have recently been republished in Russia2 (rather more extensively than those of Gan, in fact), while a lengthy section on Zhukova is to be included in Catriona Kelly’s forthcoming Russian Women’s Writing 1830–1990: A History.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
One problem for any study of Zhukova’s life is the dearth of source material. For an account of her life (and the problem of sources), see H.A. Aplin, M.S. Zhukova and E.A. Gan. Women Writing and Female Protagonists, 1837–43. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation, U.E.A., 1988), especially pp. 81–98.
See, for example, M.S. Zhukova, Vechera na Karpovke, ed. R.V. Iyezuitova (Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1986)
Dacha na Petergovskoy doroge: Proza russkikh pisatelnits pervoy poloviny XIXveka, ed. V. Uchenova (Moscow: Sovremennik, 1986). For full details of the publication of Zhukova’s work see Aplin’s excellent bibliography.
For a brief discussion of this, see B.M. Eykhenbaum, Lermontov: Opyt istoriko-literaturnoy otsenki (Munich, 1967: originally, Leningrad, 1924), p. 140.
For an excellent discussion of this motif in Pushkin’s The Prisoner of the Caucasus, see Stephanie Sandler, Distant Pleasures. Alexander Pushkin and the Writing of Exile (California: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 157–8.
For an excellent account of this chronotope in Russian literature and thought, see Marshall Berman, All That Is Solid Melts Into Air. The Experience of Modernity (London: Verso, 1983), pp. 173–286.
It is important to note that ‘chronotope’ is not just a time/space structural mechanism, but imparts value as well. As Holquist puts it: ‘Chronotope is a term, then, that brings together not just two concepts, but four: a time, plus its value; and a space, plus its value.’ See Michael Holquist, Dialogism. Bakhtin and his world (London and New York: Routledge, 1990), p. 155.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Joe Andrew
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrew, J. (1993). Mariya Zhukova and Patriarchal Power. In: Narrative and Desire in Russian Literature, 1822–49. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22679-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22679-5_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22681-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22679-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)