Skip to main content
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

In a sense even more fundamental than is the case for her younger contemporary, Elena Gan, Mariya Zhukova’s life1 and works have been ‘hidden from history’. Where Mirsky makes a few rather condescending remarks about Gan, he is completely silent on the subject of her more prolific fellow writer. The situation is no better in the much more recent Cambridge History of Russian Literature of 1989 which also has not a single reference to Zhukova, although a number of minor male prosaicists of the period feature. (Richard Stites also fails to mention her.) Finally, however, this silence is ending. Zhukova’s major works have recently been republished in Russia2 (rather more extensively than those of Gan, in fact), while a lengthy section on Zhukova is to be included in Catriona Kelly’s forthcoming Russian Women’s Writing 1830–1990: A History.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. One problem for any study of Zhukova’s life is the dearth of source material. For an account of her life (and the problem of sources), see H.A. Aplin, M.S. Zhukova and E.A. Gan. Women Writing and Female Protagonists, 1837–43. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation, U.E.A., 1988), especially pp. 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, M.S. Zhukova, Vechera na Karpovke, ed. R.V. Iyezuitova (Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dacha na Petergovskoy doroge: Proza russkikh pisatelnits pervoy poloviny XIXveka, ed. V. Uchenova (Moscow: Sovremennik, 1986). For full details of the publication of Zhukova’s work see Aplin’s excellent bibliography.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a brief discussion of this, see B.M. Eykhenbaum, Lermontov: Opyt istoriko-literaturnoy otsenki (Munich, 1967: originally, Leningrad, 1924), p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an excellent discussion of this motif in Pushkin’s The Prisoner of the Caucasus, see Stephanie Sandler, Distant Pleasures. Alexander Pushkin and the Writing of Exile (California: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 157–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For an excellent account of this chronotope in Russian literature and thought, see Marshall Berman, All That Is Solid Melts Into Air. The Experience of Modernity (London: Verso, 1983), pp. 173–286.

    Google Scholar 

  7. It is important to note that ‘chronotope’ is not just a time/space structural mechanism, but imparts value as well. As Holquist puts it: ‘Chronotope is a term, then, that brings together not just two concepts, but four: a time, plus its value; and a space, plus its value.’ See Michael Holquist, Dialogism. Bakhtin and his world (London and New York: Routledge, 1990), p. 155.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Joe Andrew

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrew, J. (1993). Mariya Zhukova and Patriarchal Power. In: Narrative and Desire in Russian Literature, 1822–49. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22679-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics