Skip to main content

Two Nations in Early Retirement? The Case of Britain

  • Chapter

Abstract

In 1955, Richard Titmuss described Britain as having ‘two nations in old age’: one group relatively fortunate, benefiting from an occupational pension and being able to draw on savings privileged under the income tax, the other group receiving only the basic state pension, which left them dependent on means-tested assistance (the successor of the Poor Law). There were:

… greater inequalities in living standards after work than in work; two contrasting social services for distinct groups based on different principles, and operating in isolation of each other as separate, autonomous, social instruments of change.

(1955, p. 166)

The research on which the paper is based forms part of the Welfare State Programme at STICERD, LSE, supported by the ESRC (Programme Grant X206 32 2001). The authors thank Jane Falkingham for her assistance and participants in the Conference for their comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaron, H. (1980). Rejuvenating US Social Security. Economic Impact, Vol. 32. Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel-Smith, B. (1953). The Reform of Social Security. Fabian Research Series No. 161. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel-Smith, B. and Townsend, P. (1965). The Poor and the Poorest. London: G. Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, R. (1982). The Incomes of the Early Retired. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. (1983). The Economics of Inequality (2nd edn). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. and Micklewright, J. (1983). On the Reliability of Income Data in the Family Expenditure Survey 1970–1977. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 146, pp. 33–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, Lord (1942). Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, N. (1987). A Generation in Limbo. London: Public Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, N., Laing, W. and Propper, C. (1990). Elderly Consumers in Britain. London: Laing & Buisson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. and Laczko, F. (1989). Early Retired or Long-term Unemployed? Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 3, pp. 509–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, A. and Evans, G. (1987). Pensioners’ Incomes and Expenditure 1970–85. Employment Gazette, May, pp. 243–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P.B. and Piore, M.J. (1971). Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G.S. and Mitchell, O.S. (1984). Retirement, Pensions, and Social Security. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M.S. (1988). Social Security Policies in Industrial Countries. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. and Thane, P. (1989). The Consolidation of ‘Old Age’ as a Phase of Life, 1945–1965. In Jefferys, M. (ed.), Growing Old in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemsley, W.F.F., Redpath, R.U. and Holmes, M. (1980). Family Expenditure Survey Handbook. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczko, F., Dale, A., Arber, S. and Gilbert, G.N. (1988). Early Retirement in a Period of High Unemployment. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 17, pp. 313–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E.P. (1979). Why Is There Mandatory Retirement? Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, pp. 1261–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.H. and Wise, D.A. (1983). Discontinuous Distributions and Missing Persons: The Minimum Wage and Unemployed Youth. Econometrica, Vol. 51, pp. 1677–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (1980). Older Workers and Retirement. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piachaud, D. (1986). Disability, Retirement and Unemployment of Older Men. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 15, pp. 145–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B.S. (1901). Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Population (1949). Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, D. (1989). The Welfare State and Generation Conflict: Winners and Losers. In Johnson, P., Conrad, C. and Thomson, D. (eds), Workers and Pensioners. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R.M. (1955). Pension Systems and Population Change. Political Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 152–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinder, C.G. (1989). Employment over 55. London: NIESR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, B., de Jong, P., Haveman, R., Halberstadt, V. and Goudswaard, K.P. (1984). Income Transfers and Work Effort: The Netherlands and the United States in the 1970s. Kyklos, Vol. 37, pp. 609–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 A. B. Atkinson and Martin Rein

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atkinson, A.B., Sutherland, H. (1993). Two Nations in Early Retirement? The Case of Britain. In: Atkinson, A.B., Rein, M. (eds) Age, Work and Social Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22668-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics