Foreign Direct Investment and the Private Sector

  • Vitalija Gaucaite

Abstract

Increasing attention has recently been paid in the European transition economies to variations in foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows among recipient countries and the extent to which FDI might be affected by the slowdown in privatization. This reflects both the relative importance and the recent slowdown of privatization-related foreign direct investment flows in most advanced transition economies, along with the capacity of their newly emerging businesses to attract foreign capital in the post-privatization period.

Keywords

Europe Income Marketing Stake OECD 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1996 (Geneva and New York, 1996), chapter II.c.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Among more recent studies, see G. Hunya and J. Stankovsky, Foreign Direct Investment in Central and East European Countries and the Former Soviet Union (Vienna: Vienna Institute for Comparative Studies, 1996)Google Scholar
  3. H. Lankes and A. Venables, ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Economic Transition: The Changing Pattern of Investment’, Economics in Transition, 4 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. K. Schmidt, ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Eastern Europe: State-of-the Art and Prospect’, in Transforming Economies and European Integration, ed. R. Dobrinsky and M. Landesmann (Aldershot: E. Elgar, 1996);R. Stern, ‘Putting Foreign Direct Investment in Eastern Europe into Perspective: Turning A Macroeconomic Failure Into Microeconomic Success Story’, in the same volumeGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Lansbury, N. Pain and K. Smidkova, ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe since 1990: An Econometric Study’, National Institute Economic Review, 156 (May 1996)Google Scholar
  6. Z. Wang and N. Swain, ‘The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transforming Economies: Empirical Evidence from Hungary and China’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 131:2 (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    Among more recent studies on these issues, see I. Filatotchev et al. ‘Buyouts in Hungary, Poland and Russia: governance and finance issues’, Economics in Transition, 4(1), 1996Google Scholar
  8. C. Grey, ‘In Search of Owners: Privatization and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies’, World Bank Research Observer, 11:2 (August 1996)Google Scholar
  9. B. Katz and J. Owen, ‘Optimal Voucher Privatization Fund Bids When Bidding Affects Firm Performance’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 24 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. D. Willer, ‘Corporate Governance and Shareholder Rights in Russia’, Emerging Markets, CEP Discussion Paper 343 (April 1997); and studies in Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia, ed. R. Frydman, C. Grey and A. Rapaczynski, (London: Central European University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  11. 5.
    C. Grey, ‘In Search of Owners: Privatization and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies’, World Bank Research Observer, 11: 2 (August 1996).Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    C. Grey, ‘In Search of Owners: Privatization and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies’, World Bank Research Observer, 11: 2 (August 1996).Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    See for instance, J. Earl and S. Estrin, ‘Worker Ownership in Transition’, in Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia, ed. R. Frydman, C. Grey and A. Rapaczynski (London: Central European University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    EBRD, Transition Report 1996 (London, 1996), p. 11.Google Scholar
  15. 11.
    I. Filatotchev et al., ‘Buy-outs in Hungary, Poland and Russia: Governance and Finance Issues’, Economics in Transition, 4:1 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    J. Kornai, Economics of Shortage (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1980).Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    R. Jackman, ‘Economic Policy and Employment in the Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe. What Have We Learned?’, International Labour Review, 133:3 (1994).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    UN/ECE, Economic Survey of Europe in 1996–1997 (Geneva and New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    UNCTAD, World Investment Report, 1996 (Geneva and New York, 1996), p. 4.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1996 (Geneva and New York, 1996), p. 65.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    UNECE, Economic Survey of Europe in 1996–1997 (Geneva and New York, 1997), chapter 3.5 and appendix table B.13.Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    J. Agarwal, ‘European Integration and German FDI: Implications for Domestic Investment and Central European Economies’, National Institute Economic Review, 2(1997).Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    UNCTAD World Investment Report 1996 (Geneva and New York, 1996), p. 67.Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    J. Agarwal, ‘European Integration and German FDI: Implications for Domestic Investment and Central European Economies’, National Institute Economic Review, 2 (1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Patrick Artisien, Matija Rojec and Marjan Svetličič 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vitalija Gaucaite

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations