Abstract
The gradual development of the Unitarians from a persecuted group, strongly associated with radical politics, to a socially powerful one, many of whose members were rich capitalists in growing industrial centres like Manchester, opened up gaps between theory and practice; and it is these gaps to which Gaskell’s first novel calls attention.1 It has been shown that her descriptions of working-class conditions and attitudes depend a great deal (to the extent of verbatim quotation of a number of paragraphs) on the Unitarian publications, The Reports of the Ministry to the Poor, for the years covered in her novel (1839–42).2 These reports were themselves fuelled by the desire to confront rich Unitarians not only with the poverty but with the feelings of their employees. Gaskell shared that desire, and wrote to recall the prosperous to a sense of Christian charity. Her targets were her own friends, members of her husband’s congregation, the leading figures in Manchester society; and while readers like Carlyle and Dickens were deeply impressed by her novel, the reaction closer to home was much less favourable. The Edinburgh Review article on Mary Barton, for example, which criticised Gaskell for dwelling on the workers’ difficulties and ignoring the sufferings of unsuccessful manufacturers, was written by William Greg, a manufacturer, Unitarian and friend.3
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For example, Manchester’s Unitarian MPs and manufacturers opposed factory legislation intended to limit employers’ powers. See Valentine Cunningham, Everywhere Spoken Against: Dissent in the Victorian Novel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975) pp. 132–3.
See Monica Fryckstedt, Elizabeth Gaskell’s Mary Barton and Ruth: A Challenge to Christian England (Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksell, 1982) pp. 88–94.
W. Greg, Edinburgh Review vol. 89 (1849) pp. 402–35. This review is discussed in Cunningham, Everywhere Spoken Against pp. 133–5.
M. Hompes, ‘Mrs E. C. Gaskell’, Gentleman’s Magazine, vol. 55 (1895) p. 124.
Carlyle, ‘Chartism’, in Critical and Miscellaneous Essays (London: Chapman and Hall, 1899) vol. IV, p. 169.
Carlyle, ‘Corn-Law Rhymes’ (1839); in Critical and Miscellaneous Essays vol. III, p. 138.
The theme of women’s public speaking is treated by Rosemarie Bodenheimer in ‘Private Grief and Public Acts in Mary Barton’, Dickens Studies Annual vol. 9 (1981) 195–216.
Elizabeth Haldane, Mrs Gaskell and Her Friends (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1931) pp. 47–8.
Craig Owens, ‘The Discourse of Others: Feminists and Postmodernism’, in Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster (London and Sydney: Pluto Press, 1985) pp. 68–9.
This point is made by W. A. Craik, who argues that in Mary Barton Gaskell needs ‘the social aim’ less for its own sake than in order ‘to justify writing at all’. See Elizabeth Gaskell and the English Provincial Novel (London: Methuen, 1975) p. 4.
Copyright information
© 1993 Jane Spencer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spencer, J. (1993). Giving Utterance: Mary Barton. In: Elizabeth Gaskell. Women Writers. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22617-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22617-7_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-37947-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22617-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)