Abstract
The US government took a series of actions in order to exert both economic and political pressure on Iran to release the hostages.1 The most effective of these was the freezing of Iranian assets. The freeze had the following implications. To begin with, it deprived Iran of access to over $14 billion of assets and properties. Secondly, it restricted Iranian international transactions by closing down the US financial markets to Iran, and by making it impossible for Iran to deal in US dollars in the first few months of the freeze. Thirdly, it created a situation whereby Iran was required by many of her trading counterparts to pay in cash for her international transactions despite her high credit rating. Fourthly, it started a flood of litigation in the United States and Europe engaging Iran in an unprecedented legal battle. The Iranian government was faced with hundreds of court cases. Over 450 US banks and giant corporations were alleging that the Iranian government was responsible for the liabilities of all the Iranian public entities. Finally, the freeze provided effective leverage in the negotiations for the release of the hostages which resulted in an agreement that was to the advantage of the United States.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Morgan Guaranty Trust had obtained court permission to attach Iranian shares in the German firm of Fried Krupp Gmbh., the parent of the steel and industrial giant in which Iran owned a 25 per cent interest. The bank also obtained a similar attachment on Iran’s share stake in the Deutsche Babcock industrial giant. See R. Assersohn, The Biggest Deal, Methuen, London, 1982, p. 95.
In Britain, US banks tried to secure attachments on debts owed by British Water Authorities to Iran, see Robert Carswell and Richard J. Davis, ‘Economic and Financial Pressures’, in Warren Christopher, American Hostages in Iran: The Conduct of a Crisis, a Council on Foreign Relations Book, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1985, p. 192, note 33.
An escrow account is: ‘A bank account kept by a third party on behalf of two others in dispute over its rightful ownership. The disputing parties try to set out conditions under which they will agree to let the money be released. When these conditions are met, the third party releases the funds’, T. Hindle, The Economist Pocket Banker, Basil Blackwell and The Economist, Oxford & London, 1985, p. 62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Mahvash Alerassool
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alerassool, M. (1993). The Algiers Accords: The Way the Crisis Was Resolved. In: Freezing Assets. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22532-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22532-3_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22534-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22532-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)