Skip to main content

The Algiers Accords: The Way the Crisis Was Resolved

  • Chapter
Freezing Assets

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

The US government took a series of actions in order to exert both economic and political pressure on Iran to release the hostages.1 The most effective of these was the freezing of Iranian assets. The freeze had the following implications. To begin with, it deprived Iran of access to over $14 billion of assets and properties. Secondly, it restricted Iranian international transactions by closing down the US financial markets to Iran, and by making it impossible for Iran to deal in US dollars in the first few months of the freeze. Thirdly, it created a situation whereby Iran was required by many of her trading counterparts to pay in cash for her international transactions despite her high credit rating. Fourthly, it started a flood of litigation in the United States and Europe engaging Iran in an unprecedented legal battle. The Iranian government was faced with hundreds of court cases. Over 450 US banks and giant corporations were alleging that the Iranian government was responsible for the liabilities of all the Iranian public entities. Finally, the freeze provided effective leverage in the negotiations for the release of the hostages which resulted in an agreement that was to the advantage of the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Morgan Guaranty Trust had obtained court permission to attach Iranian shares in the German firm of Fried Krupp Gmbh., the parent of the steel and industrial giant in which Iran owned a 25 per cent interest. The bank also obtained a similar attachment on Iran’s share stake in the Deutsche Babcock industrial giant. See R. Assersohn, The Biggest Deal, Methuen, London, 1982, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In Britain, US banks tried to secure attachments on debts owed by British Water Authorities to Iran, see Robert Carswell and Richard J. Davis, ‘Economic and Financial Pressures’, in Warren Christopher, American Hostages in Iran: The Conduct of a Crisis, a Council on Foreign Relations Book, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1985, p. 192, note 33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. An escrow account is: ‘A bank account kept by a third party on behalf of two others in dispute over its rightful ownership. The disputing parties try to set out conditions under which they will agree to let the money be released. When these conditions are met, the third party releases the funds’, T. Hindle, The Economist Pocket Banker, Basil Blackwell and The Economist, Oxford & London, 1985, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Mahvash Alerassool

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alerassool, M. (1993). The Algiers Accords: The Way the Crisis Was Resolved. In: Freezing Assets. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22532-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics