Conclusion: Religion, Literature and the Ethics of Reading Narrative

  • David Scott Arnold
Part of the Studies in Literature and Religion book series (SLR)

Abstract

I trust that the interpretative net I have flung over the preceding discussions has enabled us to see new connections, novel configurations between the text and reader, literature and religion, critical theory and the possible projects of the humanities. I use the word ‘trust’ because there is a very great mischief loosed upon us, one might imagine some in the field declaring deliberately, a very great noise indeed bruited throughout the precincts of religion and literature. The search for a basis of limitation for interpretation (Foucault), the sense of error in any grounding of meaning (Miller), the Barthian assurance of a surplus of signification, the argument advanced by Frank Kermode for the secrecy of a text as its available reserve, its potential for interpretation, the Critical Inquiry tanglings for and against interpretation — all these moves evidence an unnerving range of possible conflicting interpretations, and the way Melville, Joyce and Murdoch write may not lessen the options brought to bear on such discussions. If Chapter 2 has served as the theoretical armature of this study, spinning the skein through which the explicit chapters on the reading of narrative texts are offered, this conclusion is meant to be an act of reception of the foregoing discussions, yielding what for the reader might connect the field of religion and literature and reader-response criticism.

Keywords

Phosphorus Coherence Resis Posit Peri 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Tony Tanner, Adultery in the Novel: Contract and Trangression (Baltimore, Md, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979) p. 90.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Wayne Booth, The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1988) p. 6.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Margaret Atwood, ‘Northrop Frye Observed’, in Second Words (Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1984) p. 405.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Giles Gunn, The Interpretation of Otherness (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979) p. 5.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Edward Said, Beginnings: Intention and Method (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975) pp. 144–5.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Robert Detweiler (ed.), Art/Literature/Religion: Life on the Borders, American Academy of Religion Thematic Studies no. 49/2 (Chico, Cal.: Scholars Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    J. Hillis Miller, The Ethics of Reading (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1983) p. 65.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    Lynn M. Poland, Literary Criticism and Biblical Hermeneutics: A Critique of Formalist Approaches (Chico, Cal.: Scholars Press, 1985) pp. 169–70.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Wolfgang Iser, ‘Towards a Literary Anthropology’, in Ralph Cohen (ed.), The Future of Literary Theory (New York and London: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, 1989) p. 228.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Ibid. See also David Miller’s discussion of such liminality in the interchapter, ‘Interlude: Liminality, Boundary, and the Between’, in David L. Miller, Three Faces of God: Traces of the Trinity in Literature and Life (Philadelphia, Pa: Fortress Press, 1986) pp. 65–79.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Brook Thomas, James Joyce’s ‘Ulysses’: A Book of Many Happy Returns (Baton Rouge, La, and London: Louisiana State University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Warwick Wadlington, Reading Faulknerian Tragedy (Ithaca, N.Y., and London: Cornell University Press, 1987) p. 15.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Wolfgang Iser, ‘Towards a Literary Anthropology’, in Ralph Cohen (ed.), The Future of Literary Theory (New York and London: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, 1989), pp. 216–17.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Martin Price, Forms of Life (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983) p. 6.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    Wesley Kort, Modern Fiction and Human Time: A Study in Narrative and Belief (Tampa, Fla: University Presses of Florida/University of South Florida Press, 1985) p. 173.Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    Geoffrey Hartman, Criticism in the Wilderness: The Study of Literature Today (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980) pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
  18. 34.
    Frank Lentricchia, After the New Criticism (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1980) pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  19. 36.
    Robert Langbaum, The Modern Spirit: Essays on the Continuity of Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970) p. 10.Google Scholar
  20. 39.
    Justus George Lawler, Celestial Pantomime: Poetic Structures of Transcendence (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1979) pp. 21–2.Google Scholar
  21. 40.
    Walter Benn Michaels, ‘The Interpreter’s Self’, Georgia Review 31 (Summer 1977) pp. 383, 385.Google Scholar
  22. 41.
    See Jane P. Tompkins, ‘The Reader in History’, in Jane P. Tompkins (ed.), Reader-Response Criticism (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980) pp. 201–32.Google Scholar
  23. 42.
    Richard Poirier, The Renewal of Literature: Emersonian Reflections (New York: Random House, 1987) pp. 100 –1.Google Scholar
  24. 43.
    Wolfgang Iser, The Act of Reading (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978) p. 10.Google Scholar
  25. 44.
    Jonathan Culler, Structuralist Poetics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1975) p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 45.
    William Ray, Literary Meaning: From Phenomenology to Deconstruction (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984) p. 33.Google Scholar
  27. 46.
    Susan Suleiman, ‘Introduction: Varieties of Audience-Oriented Criticism’, in Susan Suleiman and Inge Crosman (eds), The Reader in the Text (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980) pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
  28. 47.
    David Couzens Hoy, The Critical Circle (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1978) p. 67.Google Scholar
  29. 50.
    Rudolph Kuenzli, ‘The Intersubjective Structure of the Reading Process: a Communication-Oriented Theory of Literature’, Diacritics, 10 (June 1980) p. 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 51.
    Steven Mailloux, Interpretive Conventions (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1982) p. 44.Google Scholar
  31. 52.
    Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1982) p. 38.Google Scholar
  32. 57.
    J Hillis Miller, The Times Literary Supplement no. 4410 (9–15 October 1987) p. 1104.Google Scholar
  33. 58.
    Richard Wentz, The Contemplation of Otherness (Macon, Ga: Mercer University Press, 1984) p. 11.Google Scholar
  34. 59.
    William Desmond, Desire, Dialectic and Otherness: An Essay on Origins (New Haven, Conn., and London: Yale University Press, 1987) p. 1.Google Scholar
  35. 60.
    Joanne Frye, Living Stories, Telling Lives: Women and the Novel in Contemporary Experience (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press, 1986) p. 200.Google Scholar
  36. 63.
    Harold Bloom, Ruin the Sacred Truths: Poetry and Belief from the Bible to the Present (Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press, 1989) p. 133.Google Scholar
  37. 64.
    Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978) p. 51.Google Scholar
  38. 65.
    Wallace Stevens, ‘Notes Towards a Supreme Fiction’, in The Collected Poems of Wallace Stevens (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Scott Arnold 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Scott Arnold
    • 1
  1. 1.Oregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations