Skip to main content

The Informed Electorate? Voter Responsiveness to Campaigns in Britain and Germany

  • Chapter
Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing

Part of the book series: Contemporary Political Studies ((CONTPOLSTUD))

Abstract

Previous studies of party competition and of voting behaviour often seem to talk past, rather than to, each other (for further discussion see Bowler, 1990; Budge and Farlie, 1983a; Budge and Farlie, 1983b). This separation of voting and party behaviour is particularly striking in the terms of the academic literature on the impact of campaigning. Campaigns seek to mobilise and/or persuade voters, yet relatively little work has been done in establishing that it is actually the party campaign that produces such results. As other chapters in this volume make clear, party managers and campaign advisers pay a great deal of attention to the way voter attitudes and allegiances shift in response to campaign themes. The study of this interaction between voters and campaigns is, however, much less developed than other branches of the voting studies literature.

Thanks are due to the Academic Senate of the University of California Riverside for research support. The data employed are the 1983 UK General Election Survey conducted by Heath, Jowell and Curtice and the 1983 German Panel Survey. These were obtained from the ICPSR, Ann Arbor, Michigan. None of the original investigators is responsible for the analyses contained in the chapter. The authors are solely responsible for the interpretation of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansolabehere, S., Behr, R. and Iyengar, S. (1991), ‘Mass Media and Elections: An Overview’, American Politics Quarterly, 19, pp. 109–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (1988), Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. R. (1952), Content Analysis in Communication Research (Glencoe, Ill Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. R. Lazarsfeld, P. F. and McPhee, W. N. (1954), Voting (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochel, J. M. and Denver, D.T. (1972), ‘The Impact of the Campaign on the Results of Local Government Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 2, pp. 239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohrnstedt, G.W. and Knoke, D. (1982), Statistics for Social Science Data Analysis (Itasca, Ill: F. E. Peacock Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S. (1990), ‘Voter Perceptions and Party Strategies: An Empirical Approach’, Comparative Politics, 23, pp. 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, R.A. and Page, B.I. (1973), ‘Indifference, Alienation and Rational Decisions: The Effects of Candidate Evaluations on Turnout and the Vote’, Public Choice, 15, pp. 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1983a), ‘Party Competition — Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data’, in H. Daalder and P. Mair (eds), Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1983b), Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies (London: George Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (1984), The British General Election of 1983 (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960), The American Voter (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. G. and Palda, K. S. (1989), ‘Econometric Models of Voting and Campaigning’, in M. Margolis and G. A. Mauser (eds), Manipulating Public Opinion (Pacific Grove, Ca: Brooks/Cole).

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E. (1962), ‘Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, pp. 578–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denver, D.T. and Hands, G. (1972), ‘Turnout and Marginality in Local Elections: A Comment’, British Journal of Political Science, 2, pp. 513–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D.M. and Wortman, M. (1987), ‘Party Strategies in the Electoral Market: Political Marketing in West Germany, Britain and Ireland’, European Journal of Political Research, 15, pp. 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, D. and Holmberg, S. (1990), ‘The Berelson Paradox Reconsidered: Intention-Behavior Changers in US and Swedish Election Campaigns’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, pp. 530–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G.C. (1984), ‘Money in 1980 and 1982 Congressional Elections’, in M.J. Malbin (ed.), Money and Politics in the United States: Financing Elections in the 1980s (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1977), ‘The Electoral Geography of an Election Campaign’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 93, pp. 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoue, D. (1991), ‘Debates that Mattered: Voters Reaction to the 1984 Canadian Leadership Debates’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24, pp. 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoue, D. and Schrott, P. (1991), Joint Press Conference: The History, Impact and Prospects of American Presidential Debates (New York: Greenwood Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, M. and Mauser, G.A. (1989), ‘Public Opinion as a Dependent Variable: An Empirical and Normative Assessment’, in M. Margolis and G. A. Mauser (eds), Manipulating Public Opinion (Pacific Grove, Ca: Brooks/Cole).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. L., Clarke, H.D., Harrop, M., LeDuc, L. and Whiteley, P.F. (1990), How Voters Change: The 1987 British Election Campaign in Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1972), ‘Turnout and Marginality in Local Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 2, pp. 251–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, D. (1991), ‘Exploring the Dimensions of Challenger Strength: An Explanation of House Congressional Elections, 1974–1980’, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1974), The Problem of Party Government (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schrott, P. R. (1989), ‘West German Televised Debates from 1972 to 1987’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. (1981), ‘What Decides Elections?’, in D. Butler, H. Penniman and A. Ranney (eds), Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.H. (1972), ‘The Effect of Party Organization: Correlation Between Campaign Expenditure and Voting in the 1970 Election’, Political Studies, 20, pp. 329–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.J. and Johnston, R.J. (1979), Geography of Elections (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 The Macmillan Press Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowler, S., Broughton, D., Donovan, T., Snipp, J. (1992). The Informed Electorate? Voter Responsiveness to Campaigns in Britain and Germany. In: Bowler, S., Farrell, D.M. (eds) Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. Contemporary Political Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22411-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics