Skip to main content

Michael Oakeshott and F. A. Hayek: Natural Law and the Philosophy of Liberal Conservatism

  • Chapter
The Defence of Natural Law

Abstract

It is not obvious why Oakeshott should be considered as a defender of the natural law tradition in legal and political philosophy. In On Human Conduct (1975),1 Hobbes on Civil Association (1975)2 and On History (1983),3 Oakeshott provided a complex theoretical analysis of the modern rule of law, in which he examined the constitutional order of the European state in terms of the principles of political morality central to the Hobbesian tradition of natural right. In doing so, he rejected the governing ethical and metaphysical assumptions of the great natural law tradition of Plato, Aristotle and Aquinas. Likewise, in his critique of the mentalities of European rationalism, which culminated in the publication in 1962 of the collection of essays Rationalism in Politics,4 Oakeshott called into question the very possibility of the sort of pursuit of universally valid principles of political morality that had characterized the work of the classical and medieval philosophers of natural law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Michael Oakeshott, On Human Conduct ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael Oakeshott, Hobbes on Civil Association ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Oakeshott, On History and other Essays ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and other Essays ( London: Methuen, 1962 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael Oakeshott, Experience and its Modes (Cambridge University Press, 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michael Oakeshott, ‘The Authority of the State’, Modern Churchman 19 (1929–30), 313–27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. H. Green, Prolegomena to Ethics, ed. A. C. Bradley ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1883 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. H. Green, Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation, in Works of Thomas Hill Green, ed. R. L. Nettleship, 3 vols. (London: Longmans, Green and Company, 1885–8), Vol. 2, pp. 335–553.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. H. Bradley, Ethical Studies, 2nd ed., rev. ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michael Oakeshott, ‘The Moral Life in the Writings of Thomas Hobbes’ (1960), in Rationalism in Politics pp. 248–300.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Oakeshott, ‘The Vocabulary of a Modern European State’, Political Studies 23 (1975), 319–41, 409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Michael Oakeshott, ‘Talking Politics’, National Review 27 (1975), 1345–7,1423–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes Vol. 2, pp. 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. René Descartes, Principles of Philosophy in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1, pp. 177–291.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bernard Williams, Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael Oakeshott, ‘Rationalism in Politics’, Cambridge Journal 1 (1947–8), 81–98, 145–57; rpt. in Rationalism in Politics pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michael Oakeshott, ‘Rational Conduct’, Cambridge Journal 4 (1950–1), 3–27; rpt. in Rationalism in Politics pp. 80–110.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michael Oakeshott, ‘The Tower of Babel’, Cambridge Journal 2 (19489), 67–83; rpt. in Rationalism in Politics pp. 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michael Oakeshott, ‘Scientific Politics’, Cambridge Journal 1 (1947–8), 347–58.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michael J. Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett (Cambridge University Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Michael Oakeshott, ‘The Concept of a Philosophical Jurisprudence’, Politica, 3 (1938), 203–22, 345–60.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom ( London: George Routledge and Sons, 1944 ).

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960 ).

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. A. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. A. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Vol. 1: Rules and Order ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. A. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976 ).

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. A. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michael Oakeshott, ‘Contemporary British Politics’, Cambridge Journal 1 (1947–8), 474–90.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Michael Oakeshott, ‘The Political Economy of Freedom’, Cambridge Journal 2 (1948–9), 212–29; rpt. in Rationalism in Politics pp. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Michael Oakeshott, ‘On Being Conservative’ (1956), in Rationalism in Politics pp. 168–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 Charles Covell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Covell, C. (1992). Michael Oakeshott and F. A. Hayek: Natural Law and the Philosophy of Liberal Conservatism. In: The Defence of Natural Law. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22359-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics