Abstract
Since Gorbachev came to power in 1985 there has been a widespread and unprecedented revaluation of Soviet history and a heated debate about the future development of Soviet society, far surpassing the earlier reassessment which took place under Khrushchev. Literature has played a very important part in this process, opening up new subjects for historical enquiry and challenging historians to produce a deener analysis of their countrv’s nast.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. W. Davies, Soviet History in the Gorbachev Revolution (London, 1989);
W. Laqueur, The Long Road to Freedom: Russia and Glasnost (London, Sydney and Wellington, 1989), pp. 48–77;
A. Nove, Glasnost in Action: Cultural Renaissance in Russia (Boston and London, 1989), pp. 15–102;
S. Wheatcroft, ‘Unleashing the energy of history’, Aus-tralian Slavonic and East European Studies, Vol. 1, no. 1 (1987), pp. 85— 132; idem, ‘Steadying the Energy of History’, ibid., Vol. 1, no. 1 (1987), pp. 57–114.
I. Christie, ‘The Cinema’, in J. Graffy and G. Hosking (eds), Culture and the Media in the USSR Today (London, 1989), pp. 44–5.
R. Marsh, Images of Dictatorship: Portraits of Stalin in Literature (London and New York, 1989).
A. Rybakov, Deti Arbata, Druzhba narodov, 1987, nos 4–6.
M. Shatrov, Diktatura sovesti, Teatr, 1986, no. 6; Brestskii mir, Novyi mir, 1987, no. 4; Dal’she…dal’she…dal’she!, Znamia, 1988, no. 1.
A. Zhigulin, Chernye kamni, Znamia, 1988, nos 7–8.
K. Simonov, Glazami cheloveka moego pokoleniia, Znamia, 1988, nos. 3–5.
V. Dudintsev, Belye odezhdy, Neva, 1987, no. 3, pp. 46–7; the novel is serialised in nos 1–4.
A. Pristavkin, Nochevala tuchka zolotaia, Znamia, 1987, nos 3–4.
G. Baklanov, Znamia, 1986, no. 10, pp. 3–4; Bek’s Novoe naznachenie was published in Znamia, 1986, nos 10–11.
G. Popov, ‘S tochki zreniia ekonomista (o romane Aleksandra Beka “Novoe naznachenie” ’, Nauka i zhizn’, 1987, no. 4, pp. 54–65.
A. Akhmatova, Rekviem, Oktiabr’, 1987, no. 3, pp. 103–5.
A. Tvardovskii, Po pravu pamiati, Znamia, 1987, no. 2; Novyi mir, 1987, no. 3.
V. Amlinskii, I opravdan budet kazhdyi chas, lunost’, 1986, nos 10–11;
D. Granin, Zubr, Novyi mir, 1987, nos 1–2.
V. Gerasimov, Stuk v dver’, Oktiabr’, 1987, no. 2.
Iu. Trifonov, Ischeznovenie, Druzhba narodov, 1987, no.1;
B. Iampol’-skii, Moskovskaia ulitsa, Znamia, 1988, nos 2–3.
S Antonov, ‘Vas’ka’, lunost’, 1987, nos 3–4.
V. Grossman, Zhizn’ i sud’ba, Oktiabr’, 1988, nos 1–4.
A. Rybakov, Tridtsat’ pyatyi i drugie gody, Druzhba narodov, 1988, nos 9–10.
A. Solzhenitsyn, Arkhipelag Gulag; glavy iz romana, Novyi mir, 1989, nos 8–11.
S. Zalygin, Novyi mir, 1989, no. 8, p. 7.
A. Solzhenitsyn, V kruge pervom, Novyi mir, 1990, nos 1–4, etc.
J. W. Turner, ‘The Kinds of Historical Fiction: An Essay in Definition and Methodology’, Genre (Oklahoma), Vol. xii (Fall 1979), p. 342.
For criticism of this episode, see A. Latsis, ‘S tochki zreniia sovremen-nika: zametki o romane Deti Arbata’, Izvestiia, 17 August 1987; J. Barber, ‘Children of the Arbat’, Detente, 1988, no. 11, pp. 9–11.
A. Rybakov, Literaturnaia gazeta, 19 August 1987, p. 6;
A. Solzhenitsyn, ‘On the Fragments by Boris Souvarine’, in J. Dunlop, R. Haugh and M. Nicholson (eds), Solzhenitsyn in Exile: Critical Essays and Documentary Materials (Stanford, 1985), p. 338. On the historical accuracy of Solzhenitsyn’s portrait of Stalin in V kruge pervom, see Marsh, pp. 135–73.
V. Danilov, ‘Tret’ia volna’, Voprosy istorii, 1988, no. 3, pp. 21–4.
For a different view. see D. Gillespie, ‘History, politics and the Russian peasant: Boris Mozhaev and the collectivisation of agriculture’, Slavonic and East European Review, Vol. 67, no. 2 (April 1989), p. 203, fn. 29.
See, for example, S. Wheatcroft, ‘More light on the scale of repression and excess mortality in the Soviet Union in the 1930s’, Soviet Studies, 42, no. 2 (April 1990), pp. 355–67 (p. 367);
A. Nove, ‘How many victims in the 1930s?’, ibid., p. 370; for a review of the Western literature by a Soviet scholar, see V. Danilov, Voprosy istorii, 1988, no. 3, pp. 116–21.
See the letters from K. Sidorova, L. Strizhalova, Literaturnaia gazeta, 19 August 1987, p. 4.
B. Pasternak, Doktor Zhivago, Novyi mir, 1988, nos 1–4.
A. Platonov, Kotlovan, Novyi mir, 1987, no. 6. A. Siniavsky’s Sud idet and Liubimov, which also treat this subject, have also recently been published in the USSR: see Tsena metafory ili Prestuplenie i nakazanie Siniavskogo i Danielia, compiled by E. Velikanov, ed. L. Eremina (Moscow, 1989), pp. 279–424.
A. Latynina, Literaturnaia gazeta, 14 December 1988, p. 4.
A. Latynina, ‘Solzhenitsyn i my’, Novyi mir, 1990, no. 1, pp. 241–58.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 International Council for Soviet and East European Studies, and Sheelagh Duffin Graham
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marsh, R. (1992). Reassessing the Past: Images of Stalin and Stalinism in Contemporary Russian Literature. In: Graham, S.D. (eds) New Directions in Soviet Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22331-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22331-2_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22333-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22331-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)