Abstract
The role played by Great Britain in the political and economic affairs of the independent Hungary that emerged from the First World War is one of paradox. On the one hand, given the myriad of European and global problems with which the British government had to grapple in the period immediately after the First World War, it is understandable that matters relating to Hungary would be given a relatively low priority. This sentiment was very well reflected in the words of a British statesman, Sir William Beveridge, who in early 1919 told Count Mihály Károlyi that Britain had ‘many more important things to think about than the fate of 10 million people in Hungary, and Hungary must wait her turn for political attention’.1 Yet despite Beveridge’s admonition, what might be called the ‘Hungarian question’ was to attract considerable attention and arouse a good deal of controversy in Britain in the post-war period. Despite the key role that the East Central European specialists in the British Foreign Office played in the framing of the territorial provisions of the Treaty of Trianon, many politically aware and influential Britons, including David Lloyd George, were troubled by what appeared to be unduly severe peace terms imposed on the Hungarians.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Lord Beveridge, Power and Influence (New York, 1955) p. 156.
Harold Nicolson, Peacemaking 1919 (Boston, 1965) p. 34.
For a detailed discussion of this topic, see Thomas L. Sakmyster, ‘Great Britain and the Making of the Treaty of Trianon,’ in Béla K. Király et al., Essays on World War I: Total War and Peacemaking: A Case-Study on Trianon (New York, 1982) pp. 107–29.
Thus, British observers in Danubian Europe provided much important first-hand information on Béla Kun’s Soviet Republic. See Ferenc Tibor Zsuppan, ‘The Hungarian Red Army as Seen Through British Eyes’, in Peter Pastor (ed.), Revolutions and Interventions in Hungary and its Neighbor States, 1918–1919 (New York, 1988) pp. 89–104.
Joint Labour Delegation for Hungary, Report on the White Terror in Hungary (London, 1920).
Nathaniel Katzburg, Hungary and the Jews (Jerusalem, 1981) p. 56.
Report of Athelstan Johnson, 11 October 1920, PRO, F0371/4861/C9029/21. See also Marie-Luise Becker, England und der Donauraum, 1919–1929, Probleme einer europäischer Nachkriegsordnung (Stuttgart, 1976) p. 198.
On this see György Ránki, Economy and Foreign Policy: The Struggle of the Great Powers for Hegemony in the Danube Valley, 1919–1939 (Boulder, 1983) pp. 17–21;
and Ozer Carmi, La Grande-Bretagne et la Petite Entente (Geneva, 1972) pp. 88–115.
Géza Jeszenszky, ‘Egy viszonzatlan szerelem történetéböl. A britmagyar kapczolatok 150 éve,’ Korfrs , no. 7 (1981), pp. 116–17.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 International Council for Soviet and East European Studies, and John Morison
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sakmyster, T. (1992). Great Britain and the Establishment of the Horthy Regime. In: Morison, J. (eds) Eastern Europe and the West. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22299-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22299-5_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22301-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22299-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)