Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy ((CICETP))

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

For a long time many economists, including notably myself, have predicted that the pattern of large current account deficits and surpluses that emerged in the mid-1980s would prove unfinanceable on a sustained basis. In 1987 this prediction appeared to be coming true. The world’s central banks had to finance a large proportion of the US current account deficit (1), and despite this the dollar fell sharply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Stephen Marris: Deficits and the Dollar: the World Economy at Risk, Washington DC, 1987, Institute for International Economics, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Voichi Funabashi: Managing the Dollar: from the Plaza to the Louvre, Washington DC, Institute for international Economics, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Stephen Marris: Deficits and the Dollar: the World Economy at Risk, Washington DC, Institute for International Economics, 1987, pp. 118–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. There is, however, currently a question of whether a major mistake may be being made in the management of the EMS. There has been no realignment for 29 months, the longest period since the inception of the EMS. To some extent this appears to be justified by a remarkable convergence in national unit labour costs movements over the last three years. But this has not prevented the emergence of a very large German current account surplus, notably vis-a-vis other European countries. For the time being this has not proved troublesome because for so long as the United States is running a very large deficit the deficits of the other EMS participants have remained relatively small. But if and when the US deficit comes down sharply, correction of the major payments imbalance within Europe could well involve an upward realignment of the DM of a magnitude which could seriously undermine the hard won credibility of the EMS. See Stephen Marris: “Whither the EMS”, Amex Bank Review, April 1989,

    Google Scholar 

  5. and William R. Cline: United States External Adjustment and the World Economy, Washington DC, Institute for international Economics, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 SIPI Srl, Rivista di Politica Economica

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marris, S. (1992). Deficits and Surpluses Forever?. In: Baldassarri, M., Paganetto, L., Phelps, E.S. (eds) International Economic Interdependence, Patterns of Trade Balances and Economic Policy Coordination. Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22256-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics