Skip to main content

Conflict Resolution Theory and its Application to Guatemala’s Socio-Political Context

  • Chapter
Internal Conflict and Governance

Abstract

Like any theory, conflict resolution theory is merely an analytical tool whose usefulness (or lack of such) is revealed when applied to a specific concrete situation. If the concepts explain actual phenomena, the theory sheds light on reality, and the social and political processes are better understood; the theory can even be useful in formulating a course of political action or in suggesting to the political actors a certain direction for their decisions, much as scientific investigators accept a ‘normative’ focus for their work. This latter, however, is fraught with danger. Often theories become immutable dogmas, complete with infallible ‘recipes’ to be applied in any and all places and historical circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • dos Santos, M., 1987. Pactos en la Crisis: Una Reflexion Regional sobre la Construccion de la Democracia, Buenos Aires: CLACSO (Consejo Latino-americano de Ciencias Sociales).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J., 1981. ‘Contribution Especffica de la Irenologia al Estudio de la Violencia’, in La Violencia y sus Causas, Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa I.C., 1990. ‘El Recurso del Miedo’, Revista Nueva Sociedad, no. 106, Caracas, January-February, pp. 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorostiaga, X., 1988. Whither Central America in ‘Envio’, Managua: CRIES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B., 1988. ‘Third World Arms Control and World System Conflicts’, Arms Transfer Limitations and Third World Security, Thomas Ohlson ed., Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, New York: Oxford Univer- sity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRIPAZ (Instituto de Relaciones Internationales e Investigaciones para la Paz), 1990. Cronologta del Proceso de Paz Guatemala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M., 1990. ‘Anger, Bluff and Cooperation’, TIME, (international edt.), no. 23, June 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, G., 1990. World Data in Figures, Research Information no. 5, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, M.M., A. Elizade & M. Hopenhayn, 1986. ‘Desarrollo a Escala Humana: Una Opci6n para el Futuro’, Development Dialogue, CEPAUR (Centro de Alternativas de Desarrollo), Uppsala: Fundaci6n Dag Hammarskjold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, L.A., M. Lujan & E. Garcia, 1988. ‘Towards a Just and Lasting Resolution of Internal Armed Conflicts in Periods of Transition: Reflections on the Cases of the Philippines and Guatemala’, Towards Conflict Resolution in the Third World, Goran Lindgren and Peter Wallensteen eds., Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, G., 1988. Transicion Politica, Dialogo Nacional y Pacto Social’, Momento, Asociacién de Investigation y Estudios Sociales, Guatemala, no. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavenhagen, R., 1990. Guta Mundial de Minorias Etnicas, El Colegio de México, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A., 1973. ‘Le Système Politique ou Institutionnel’, in Production de la Société, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A., 1988. La Parole et le Sang, Politique et Société en Amerique Latine, Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudeau, R., 1986. Democracia en Guatemala, Estado Actual, Perspectives Futures, Rhode Island: Providence College.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO/FLACSO, 1982. Etnocidio o Etnodesarrollo, DOCIP (Centre de Documentation, Recherche et Information des Populations Indigènes ), Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallensteen, P., 1988. ‘Understanding Conflict Resolution: A Framework’, in Peace Research: Achievements and Challenges, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallensteen, P., J. Galtung & C. Portales, 1985. ‘Incompatibility, Militarization and Conflict Resolution’, Global Militarization, Wallensteen, P., J. Galtung & C. Portales, eds, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Padilla, L.A. (1992). Conflict Resolution Theory and its Application to Guatemala’s Socio-Political Context. In: Rupesinghe, K. (eds) Internal Conflict and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22246-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics