Skip to main content

Did the Stolypin Land Reform Destroy the Peasant Commune?

  • Chapter
New Perspectives in Modern Russian History

Abstract

Since Gorbachev came to power in the Soviet Union, there has been a reappraisal of the role of Stolypin in Russian agrarian history. In contrast to the hitherto exclusively negative evaluations of the reforms, one now reads in the press that Stolypin had just the right solution for the agrarian problem — not only the pre-revolutionary, but today’s as well. The words of one deputy to the Congress of Peoples’ Deputies are interesting in this respect: ‘I think that the farmers we are so afraid of will be a buttress of our perestroika in the countryside. Stolypin was no fool. He understood who could be the foundation, so to speak, of the state’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. Pavlovsky, Agricultural Russia on the Eve of Revolution (New York, Fertig, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Atkinson, ‘The Statistics on the Russian Land Commune’, Slavic Review, vol. 32, no. 4 (December 1973) pp. 713–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. M. Dubrovskii, Stolpyinskaya zemel′naya reforma (Moscow, Izd. Akademii Nauk, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. On the social dynamics of the peasantry the various sides of the debate are outlined in T. Shanin, The Awkward Class: Political Sociology of Peasantry in a Developing Society (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Confino, ‘Russian Customary Law and the Study of Peasant Men-talités’, The Russian Review, vol. 44 (1985) p. 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Pallot, ‘Khutora and Otruba in Stolypin’s Programme of Farm Individualisation’, Slavic Review, vol. 42, no. 2 (Summer 1984) pp. 242–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Yaney, The Urge to Mobilize: Agrarian Reform in Russia, 1861–1930 (Urbana, Ill., University of Illinois Press, 1982) p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Pallot and D. Shaw, Landscape and Settlement in Romanov Russia 1613–1917 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990) p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Pallot, ‘The Development of Peasant Land-holding from Emancipation to Revolution’ in J. H. Bater and R. A. French (eds), Studies in Russian Historical Geography (London, Academic, 1983) pp. 105–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 International Committee for Soviet and East European Studies, and Robert B. McKean

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pallot, J. (1992). Did the Stolypin Land Reform Destroy the Peasant Commune?. In: McKean, R.B. (eds) New Perspectives in Modern Russian History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22210-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22210-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22212-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22210-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics