Abstract
In The Lord of the Rings, the work of his prime (it was begun in 1937, his forty-sixth year, and published in 1954–5), Tolkien realised for the first and only time the full potential of his creative imagination. The realisation was possible for two reasons: firstly because he constructed here a uniquely expansive form, which allowed the fullest embodiment to imaginative conceptions of (as it proved) great aesthetic and emotional potency; and secondly because he arrived in this work, after a twenty-year apprenticeship with many false starts, at a style, or range of styles, and an expertise in narrative, sufficient for the those conceptions to be made transparent. Chapter 2 will be largely devoted to examining the execution of the narrative and its styles; the present one to the form, and to the conceptions and their potency. But the distinction is, of course, unsustainable at the highest level of aesthetic coherence, and this will, I hope, become apparent by the time the analysis is complete.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
D. S. Brewer, ‘The Lord of the Rings as Romance’, M. Salu and R. T. Farrell (eds), J. R. R.Tolkien: scholar and storyteller: essays in memoriam (Cornell University Press, 1979) p. 249
C. Stimpson, J. R. R. Tolkien (Columbia University Press, 1969) p. 29.
The tale has a root there; it grows in that soil; it has a spine of its own behind the words’ (R. L. Stevenson, ‘My First Book’, Essays in the Art of Writing (Chatto & Windus, 1920) pp. 135–6).
It is her failure to recognise the aesthetic function of the expansiveness of Middle-earth that fatally weakens Christine Brooks-Rose’s structuralist analysis of the work in The Rhetoric of the Unreal (Cambridge, 1983, pp. 233–55).
W. H. Auden, ‘The Quest Hero’, N. D. Isaacs and R. A. Zimbardo (eds), Tolkien and the Critics (University of Notre Dame Press, 1968) p. 51.
Guy Davenport also notices the resemblance to Sherlock Holmes (‘J. R. R. Tolkien, R.I.P.’, National Review, September 28, 1973, pp. 1042–3.)
Nabokov, ‘On a Book Entitled Lolita’, Lolita (Penguin, 1980) p. 313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Brian Rosebury
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosebury, B. (1992). The Lord of the Rings: (1) Conception. In: Tolkien. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22133-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22133-2_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22135-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22133-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)