Abstract
At the beginning of the 1970s many theorists expressed a preference for ‘clean floating’. According to Kreuger ‘it must be noted that the economics profession was overwhelmingly of the view that flexible exchange rates would be vastly superior to fixed exchange rates’ (Kreuger, 1982, p. 4). This is now history. Recently, MacDonald summarized six theoretical arguments in favour of flexible exchange rates. None of them has fulfilled its promise since the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system in 1973 (MacDonald, 1988, p. 1–37). Theories of ‘clean floating’ are in general impractical and out of date. In this study we will distinguish between flexible, stable and fixed exchange rates. Flexible exchange rates are the result of supply and demand as these apply to currencies, with the possibility of clean and managed floating. Stable exchange rates are declared officially but are adjustable; revaluations and devaluations are possible. Fixed exchange rates are unchangeable. As far as the internal market of the European Economic Community in particular is concerned, a high degree of official exchange rate stability is desirable. A careful theoretical study by Van der Ploeg concludes rightly ‘that the completion of a common European market may be a prerequisite for full monetary union within Europe’ (Ploeg, van der, 1989, p. 51).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Allen, P.R. (1983): ‘Policies to correct Cyclical Imbalance within a Monetary Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 21 (3) March.
Clout, H. A.O. (1985): Western Europe: Geographical perspectives (London).
Delors J. (1989): Report on economic and monetary union, 12 April 1989, prepared under chairmanship of Jacques Delors, chairman of the European Community.European Economy, 34, November 1987, p. 73–4.
European Economy, 34, November 1987, p. 73–4.
Fels, J. (1987): ‘The European Monetary System 1979–1987; Why has it worked?’ ‘Inter economics’, 22, September/October.
Frankmeyer, F. (1987): ‘Was kostet die Vollendung des Europäischen Binnenmarktes?’ Konjunkturpolitik, 3.
IFO (Institute for Economic Research), (1988), Schnelldienst, 35–6,’ staats-defizit und zahlungsbilanz’, especially p. 38.
Kleinmeyer, N. (1987): ‘Die Weiterentwicklung des Europäischen Währungs-systems’ (Berlin) p. 15.
Kreuger, A.D. (1982): ‘Exchange Rate Determination’ (Cambridge).
MacDonald, R. (1988): Floating exchange rates, Theories and evidence, (London: Unwin Hyman) pp. 1–37.
Masera, R. St. (1987): ‘An increasing role for the ECU: A character in search of a script’, Princeton, p. 21.
Ploeg, F. van der (1989): ‘Macro-economic policy co-ordination and monetary integration. A European perspective’-Advice prepared for the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (The Hague) p. 51.
Rijnvos, C.J. (1989): ‘De Europese Gemeenschap in 1995’ De Europese Monetaire Integratie: vier visies — Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, The Hague, p. 108–175.
Ruding, H.O.C.R. (1969): Naar één geïtegreerde Europese kapitaalmarkt (Leiden).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Confederation of European Economic Associations
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rijnvos, C.J. (1992). Government Finance, Real Interest Rates and the European Monetary System. In: Winckler, G. (eds) Tax Harmonization and Financial Liberalization in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22008-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22008-3_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22010-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22008-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)