Abstract
I have written, we have all more or less written, that the amazing return to Camus that we are witnessing signals a refusal of history. It is also at least partially an unwillingness to take refuge simply in transcendence and a sort of active moral consent to rebellion and to happiness. Everything has indeed been said on this theme, but I would like to make two preliminary observations which will help me to give you the latest stage in my own, obviously subjective, view of Camus.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Camus, Albert, Thé âtre, récits, nouvelles (Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléïade, 1962).
Camus, Albert, Essais (Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléïade, 1965).
Camus, Albert, The Stranger, Matthew Ward (trans.) (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988).
Camus, Albert, The Fall and Exile and the Kingdom, Justin O’Brien (trans.) (New York: Random House, Modern Library, 1964).
Camus, Albert, The Plague (New York: Random House, 1972).
Camus, Albert, ‘Retour à Tipasa’, from L’Eté, in Philip Thody (ed.) Lyrical and Critical Essays, Ellen Conroy Kennedy (trans.) (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daniel, J. (1992). Innocence in Camus and Dostoievsky. In: King, A. (eds) Camus’s L’Etranger: Fifty Years on. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22003-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22003-8_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22005-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22003-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)