Anointing the Sick and the Dying in Christian Antiquity and the Early Medieval West

  • Frederick S. Paxton

Abstract

After the apostolic period, in which miraculous healings announced the coming of the kingdom of God, the Christian communities of antiquity developed two modes of response to the presence of sickness among their members.1 They prayed directly to God for the recovery of the sick and they performed rituals of healing, either through the laying on of hands or through anointing with oil. Both activities had their roots in Judaism, which distinguished itself among the belief systems of antiquity in the depth of its faith in the one God as the source of all sickness and cure. But Yahweh was not the only healing god of antiquity, and appeal to divine intervention was a common recourse in the lands bordering the Mediterranean. Similarly, both Jews and non-Jews had long used oil in a variety of medical and ritual circumstances.2 Thus, for those who saw a structural connection between sinfulness, ritual impurity, and sickness, bodily health could follow upon ritual purification with water, blood, or oil. Although Jesus sometimes criticized such attitudes within Judaism, his healing miracles often comprised a forgiveness of sins as well as a restoration of health. The apostle James, moreover, by mentioning the forgiveness of sins in the context of a recommendation to anoint the sick with oil (James 5:14–15), inextricably linked the two. Consequently, some later Christian prayers and rituals for the sick emphasized the forgiveness of sins, others the cure of the body, and still others both.

Keywords

Europe Resis Gall Eter Burial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    On miraculous healing in early Christianity, see H.C. Kee, Medicine, Miracle, and Magic in New Testament Times (Cambridge 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    See Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Enzyklopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. XVII (Stuttgart 1937), cols 2013–14 s.v. Ölbaum, DC. “Medezinische Verwendung”;Google Scholar
  3. P. Hofmeister, Die heiligen Öle in der morgen- und abendländischen Kirche: Eine kirchenrechtlich-liturgische Abhandlung, Das östliche Christentum, Abhandlungen, n.s. 6/7 (Würzburg 1948).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    A. Chavasse, Etude sur l’onction des infirmes dans l’église latine du IIIeau XIesiècle, I: Du IIIesiècle à la réforme carolingienne (Lyon 1942), pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    On Caesarius, see A. Malnory, Saint Césaire: Evêque d’Arles 503–43 (Paris 1894, repr. 1978),Google Scholar
  6. and W.M. Daly, “Caesarius of Arles, a Precursor of Medieval Christendom”, Traditio 26 (1970) 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Caesarius’s thoughts on the anointing of the sick can be found in his sermons, ed. G. Morin, Sancti Caesarii Arelatensis sermones, 2 vols, Corpus Christianorum series Latina 103–04 (Turnhout 1963), esp. sermons 50, 52, and 184.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    L. Thorndyke, A History of Magic and Experimental Science, vol. I (New York 1923), pp. 566–93.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Editions of these rites can be found in F. E. Warren, The Liturgy and Ritual of the Celtic Church (Oxford 1881; repr. with intro. and bibliography by J. Stevenson, Woodbridge, Suffolk and Wolfeboro, NH 1987), pp. 164–73, and The Stowe Missal (Ms. D.II.3 in the Library of the Royal Irish Academy, Dublin), ed. G.F. Warner, Henry Bradshaw Society 32 (London 1915), pp. 33–36.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Lev. 21:1–12. On the influence of Mosaic law on Irish canon law, see P. Fournier and G. Le Bras, Histoire des collections canoniques en occident, 2 vols (Paris 1931), I, 62–64;Google Scholar
  11. P. Fournier, “Le Liber ex lege Moysi et les tendances bibliques du droit canonique irlandais”, Revue celtique 30 (1909) 221–34;Google Scholar
  12. and R. Kottje, Studien zum Einfluss des alten Testamentes auf Recht und Liturgie der frühen Mittelalters (Bonn 1970).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    For a comparable discussion of Irish influence on the use and meaning of anointing in eighth-century political rituals, see M.J. Enright, Iona, Tara, and Soissons: The Origin of the Royal Anointing Ritual, Arbeiten zur Frühmittelalterforschung 17 (Berlin 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    L.C. MacKinney, Early Medieval Medicine: With Special Reference to France and Chartres, Publications of the Institute of the History of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, 3rd ser., The Hideyo Noguchi Lectures 3 (Baltimore 1937, repr. New York 1979), pp. 24–25, 61–68;Google Scholar
  15. P. Brown, “Relics and Social Status in the Age of Gregory of Tours”, in his Society and the Holy in Late Antiquity (Berkeley 1982), pp. 222–50. For a recent assessment of Gregory that takes serious issue with MacKinney’s findings,Google Scholar
  16. see Jerome Kroll and Bernard Bachrach, “Sin and the Etiology of Disease in Pre-Crusade Europe”, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 41 (1986) 405–06.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    On unity and diversity in Carolingian Francia, see R.E. Sullivan, “The Carolingian Age: Reflections on its Place in the History of the Middle Ages”, Speculum 64 (1989) 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 22.
    J. Deshusses, “Le ‘Supplément’ au sacramentaire grégorien: Alcuin ou Saint Benoît d’Aniane?” Archiv für Liturgiewissenschaft 9 (1965) 48–71; cf. Vogel, Medieval Liturgy, pp. 85–86.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    J.J. Contreni, “Masters and Medicine in Northern France during the Reign of Charles the Bald”, in Charles the Bald: Court and Kingdom, ed. M. Gibson and J. Nelson, BAR International Series 101 (Oxford 1981), pp. 333–50.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    J. Deshusses, “Chronologie des grands sacramentaires de St.-Amand” and “Encore les sacramentaires de St.-Amand”, Revue bénédictine 87 (1977) 230–37 and 89 (1979) 310–12;Google Scholar
  21. R. McKitterick, “Charles the Bald (823–877) and his Library: The Patronage of Learning”, English Historical Review 95 (1980) 42–46. For a detailed discussion of the rites for the sick and the dying in these MSS, see ch. 5 of my Christianizing Death. Google Scholar
  22. 30.
    Vatican MS. Pal. lat. 485, fols 58r-v; on the MS as a whole, see F.S. Paxton, “Bonus liber: A Late Carolingian Clerical Manual from Lorsch (Bibliotheca Vaticana MS Pal. lat. 485)”, in The Two Laws: Studies in Medieval Legal History Dedicated to Stephan Kuttner, ed. L. Mayali and S.A.J. Tibbets, Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Canon Law 1 (Washington, DC 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick S. Paxton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations