Skip to main content
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

Up to the present day many talented women have found the search for a secure seat in the House of Commons a frustrating experience. One study of parliamentary candidates found that in the 1950s and 1960s it was still common for Conservative selection committees to ask married women why they were prepared to neglect their husbands and children, while also interrogating single women on their marriage plans!1 Each of the party organisations has invariably excused its discrimination against female aspirants by pointing to the prejudice amongst the electorate. However, there is reason to think that such prejudice has dwindled to negligible proportions, and that the heart of the problem has always been the constituency selection committees.2 Consequently one tends to start from the assumption that women’s parliamentary ambitions have always been thwarted by male obstructionism. But how far can we be certain about this? It would be surprising if attitudes among both politicians and voters had not fluctuated since the 1920s when women candidates were obviously a novelty. Nor would it be wise to assume that the aspirations of today’s women are the same as those of the inter-war generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Austin Ranney, Pathways to Parliament (1965), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jill Hills, ‘Candidates, the Impact of Gender’, Parliamentary Affairs, XXXIV, 2 (1981), 221–2, 225–7;

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. L. Leonard, Guide to the General Election (1964), p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jill Liddington, The Life and Times of a Respectable Rebel: Selina Cooper 1864–1946 (1984), pp. 295–7, 325–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Women’s Unionist Organisation, Annual Conference Reports, 1922, pp. 3–4; K. O. Morgan, Consensus and Disunity (1979), p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lloyd George to Megan Lloyd George, 22 May 1928, Lloyd George Papers (National Library of Wales), 20475C/3147; Thelma Cazalet, From the Wings (1967), pp. 50–1;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duchess of Atholl, Working Partnership (1958), p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Women’s Unionist Organisation, Annual Conference Reports, 1932, pp. 32–5; John Ramsden, The Age of Balfour and Baldwin (1978), pp. 245–6, 248.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leah Manning, A Life for Education (1970), pp. 79, 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jennie Lee, My Life With Nye (1980), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mary Agnes Hamilton, Remembering My Good Friends (1944), pp. 71, 172–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. S. Rasmussen, ‘Women Candidates in British By-Elections: a National Choice Interpretation of Electoral Behaviour’, Political Studies, 29, 2 (1981) 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Edith Summerskill, A Woman’s World (1967), pp. 50–3; Manning, Life for Education, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quoted in Anthony Masters, Nancy Astor (1981), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elizabeth Vallance, Women in the House (1979), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brian Harrison, ‘Women in a Men’s House: the Women MPs, 1919–1945’, Historical Journal, 29,3 (1986), 630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jean Mann, Woman in Parliament (1962), pp. 18, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ellen Wilkinson, Peeps at Politicians (1930), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. J. Hetherington, Katharine Atholl 1874–1960 (1989), pp. 136–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Picton-Turbervill, Life Is Good (1939), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Beatrice Webb, Diaries 1924–1932 (1933), p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Margaret Bondfield, A Life’s Work (1948), p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodney Lowe, Adjusting to Democracy (1986), pp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Martin Pugh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pugh, M. (2000). The Political Containment of Women 1918–1939. In: Women and the Women’s Movement in Britain, 1914–1999. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21850-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics