Abstract
Up to the present day many talented women have found the search for a secure seat in the House of Commons a frustrating experience. One study of parliamentary candidates found that in the 1950s and 1960s it was still common for Conservative selection committees to ask married women why they were prepared to neglect their husbands and children, while also interrogating single women on their marriage plans!1 Each of the party organisations has invariably excused its discrimination against female aspirants by pointing to the prejudice amongst the electorate. However, there is reason to think that such prejudice has dwindled to negligible proportions, and that the heart of the problem has always been the constituency selection committees.2 Consequently one tends to start from the assumption that women’s parliamentary ambitions have always been thwarted by male obstructionism. But how far can we be certain about this? It would be surprising if attitudes among both politicians and voters had not fluctuated since the 1920s when women candidates were obviously a novelty. Nor would it be wise to assume that the aspirations of today’s women are the same as those of the inter-war generation.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Austin Ranney, Pathways to Parliament (1965), p. 96.
Jill Hills, ‘Candidates, the Impact of Gender’, Parliamentary Affairs, XXXIV, 2 (1981), 221–2, 225–7;
R. L. Leonard, Guide to the General Election (1964), p. 97.
Jill Liddington, The Life and Times of a Respectable Rebel: Selina Cooper 1864–1946 (1984), pp. 295–7, 325–9.
Women’s Unionist Organisation, Annual Conference Reports, 1922, pp. 3–4; K. O. Morgan, Consensus and Disunity (1979), p. 153.
Lloyd George to Megan Lloyd George, 22 May 1928, Lloyd George Papers (National Library of Wales), 20475C/3147; Thelma Cazalet, From the Wings (1967), pp. 50–1;
Duchess of Atholl, Working Partnership (1958), p. 126.
Women’s Unionist Organisation, Annual Conference Reports, 1932, pp. 32–5; John Ramsden, The Age of Balfour and Baldwin (1978), pp. 245–6, 248.
Leah Manning, A Life for Education (1970), pp. 79, 99–100.
Jennie Lee, My Life With Nye (1980), p. 63.
Mary Agnes Hamilton, Remembering My Good Friends (1944), pp. 71, 172–3.
J. S. Rasmussen, ‘Women Candidates in British By-Elections: a National Choice Interpretation of Electoral Behaviour’, Political Studies, 29, 2 (1981) 271.
Edith Summerskill, A Woman’s World (1967), pp. 50–3; Manning, Life for Education, p. 104.
Quoted in Anthony Masters, Nancy Astor (1981), p. 147.
Elizabeth Vallance, Women in the House (1979), p. 15.
Brian Harrison, ‘Women in a Men’s House: the Women MPs, 1919–1945’, Historical Journal, 29,3 (1986), 630.
Jean Mann, Woman in Parliament (1962), pp. 18, 23.
Ellen Wilkinson, Peeps at Politicians (1930), p. 25.
S. J. Hetherington, Katharine Atholl 1874–1960 (1989), pp. 136–7.
E. Picton-Turbervill, Life Is Good (1939), p. 173.
Beatrice Webb, Diaries 1924–1932 (1933), p. 133.
Margaret Bondfield, A Life’s Work (1948), p. 253.
Rodney Lowe, Adjusting to Democracy (1986), pp. 39–40.
Copyright information
© 2000 Martin Pugh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pugh, M. (2000). The Political Containment of Women 1918–1939. In: Women and the Women’s Movement in Britain, 1914–1999. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21850-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21850-9_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49440-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21850-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)