Abstract
My arrest and indictment by the Federal authorities because of a speech opposing Allied intervention in Russia raises a more important question than that of Russian intervention.1 It directly involves the efficient conduct of the war by the Governments of the United States and of the Allies for the democratic aims proclaimed by President Wilson.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Walter Lippmann and Charles Merz, ‘A Test of the News’, New Republic, 23 (supplement, 4 August 1920), pp. 1–42, which concentrated upon the New York Times reports between March 1917 and March 1920.
They occupied Vladivostok on 30 June. For a detailed account of this episode and of the cooperation between the Corps and the Whites, see William Henry Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, 2 vols (London, 1965), II, ch. xx.
See John Wheeler-Bennett, Brest-Litovsk: The Forgotten Peace, March 1918 (London, 1966) p. 325.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Homberger, E., Biggart, J. (1992). Memorandum to Colonel House on Intervention in Russia. In: Homberger, E., Biggart, J. (eds) John Reed and the Russian Revolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21836-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21836-3_22
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21838-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21836-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)