Abstract
The search for the Logos, defined as the right or ultimate relationship of universal and particular, was a major pursuit of Romanticism. If entities or ideas similarly described denote similar objects, then the Logos may well be seen as belonging to the company of words like imagination, irony, poetry, incarnation, Aufhebung, concrete universal. The Logos, like those terms, refers to the reconciliation of opposites, of such polarities as finite-infinite, body-soul, mind-nature, passive-active, empiricism-rationalism, thing-word, particular-universal, image-idea, matter-form.
If you or I crib a little something, that’s plagiarism.
But if Samuel Taylor Coleridge cribs stuff from
Germany, don’t you feel you need another word for it?
Stanley Cavell
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Gerald McNiece
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McNiece, G. (1992). Kant, Schiller and Fichte. In: The Knowledge that Endures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21823-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21823-3_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-21825-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21823-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)